Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Dentistry: Current Applications, Emerging Trends, and Future Directions.
Аннотация
Background/
Objective
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare and has emerged as a promising tool in pediatric dentistry. This narrative review examines the methodological foundations, current applications, limitations, and future directions of AI in pediatric dental practice.
Methods
A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant English-language publications from database inception through to May 2026, using predefined search terms and eligibility criteria. Following screening and full-text assessment, 72 unique publications were retained for the narrative synthesis.
Results
AI applications in pediatric dentistry include early childhood caries detection and risk prediction, dental plaque assessment, identification of mesiodens and supernumerary teeth, dental age estimation, automated tooth detection, fissure-sealant evaluation, and craniofacial growth prediction. Several imaging-based models demonstrated performance comparable to experienced clinicians. However, many studies relied on retrospective, single-center datasets and lacked external or prospective validation. Additional concerns included algorithmic bias, data privacy, limited interpretability, and infrastructure requirements.
Conclusions
AI has considerable potential to improve diagnostic efficiency, consistency, and personalized preventive care in pediatric dentistry. However, it should be used as a clinical decision-support tool rather than a replacement for professional judgment. Future research should prioritize prospective multicenter validation, multimodal and explainable systems, standardized reporting, and ethical clinical implementation.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.