American heart journal · 2012
Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II (STAR AF II): design and rationale.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verma Atul, Sanders Prashanthan, Macle Laurent, Deisenhofer Isabel, Morillo Carlos A, Chen Jian, Jiang Chen-yang, Ernst Sabine, Mantovan Roberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal ablation approach for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unknown. In particular, it is unclear if pulmonary vein (PV) antral isolation (PVI) is sufficient as a lone strategy for persistent AF. Furthermore, if additional substrate ablation is to be added, the ideal approach to substrate ablation is yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the optimal strategy of catheter ablation of persistent AF by comparing the efficacy of 3 strategies: PVI vs PVI plus complex fractionated electrogram (CFE) ablation (PVI + CFE) vs PVI plus linear ablation (PVI + Lines).
STUDY DESIGN: The STAR AF II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01203748) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes. A total of 549 patients will be randomized in a 1:4:4 fashion to one of the investigation arms: PVI, PVI + CFE, and PVI + Lines, respectively. Patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for symptomatic, persistent AF that is refractory to at least 1 antiarrhythmic medication will be included. Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting >7 days and <3 years. Patients with a left atrial parasternal size ≥60 mm will be excluded. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF >30 seconds at 18 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures with or without antiarrhythmic medications.
CONCLUSIONS: The STAR AF II study is a randomized trial designed to evaluate the optimal approach for catheter ablation of persistent AF.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the optimal strategy of catheter ablation of persistent AF by comparing the efficacy of 3 strategies: PVI vs PVI plus complex fractionated electrogram (CFE) ablation (PVI + CFE) vs PVI plus linear ablation (PVI + Lines).
STUDY DESIGN: The STAR AF II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01203748) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes. A total of 549 patients will be randomized in a 1:4:4 fashion to one of the investigation arms: PVI, PVI + CFE, and PVI + Lines, respectively. Patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for symptomatic, persistent AF that is refractory to at least 1 antiarrhythmic medication will be included. Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting >7 days and <3 years. Patients with a left atrial parasternal size ≥60 mm will be excluded. The primary end point is freedom from documented AF >30 seconds at 18 months after 1 or 2 ablation procedures with or without antiarrhythmic medications.
CONCLUSIONS: The STAR AF II study is a randomized trial designed to evaluate the optimal approach for catheter ablation of persistent AF.