Heart rhythm · 2012
High-frequency stimulation of the atria increases early recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sairaku Akinori, Yoshida Yukihiko, Kamiya Hiroki, Tatematsu Yasushi, Nanasato Mamoru, Hirayama Haruo, Nakano Yukiko, Kihara Yasuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the atria induces atrial fibrillation (AF) when applied during sinus rhythm and elicits a parasympathetic response when delivered at sites where ganglionated plexi (GPs) are located. However, little is known about its impact after an electrophysiological study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of HFS on the short-term and long-term outcomes after the ablation of persistent AF.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF were randomly assigned to either receive HFS of the left atrium (n = 15) or not (n = 15) during their electrophysiological studies. Patients receiving HFS were examined to determine whether or not a vagal response was elicited by the HFS at sites where GPs were located before and after conventional pulmonary vein isolation without any ablation targeting the GPs. Patients not receiving the HFS underwent the ablation procedure alone. The rate of recurrence of AF within 3 months of the procedure (early recurrence [ER]) and the frequency of that occurring after that period (late recurrence) were compared between the patient groups.
RESULTS: The incidence of ER occurred more frequently in patients with HFS than in those without (80% vs 40%; P = .015), whereas the occurrence of late recurrence was similar between the 2 groups (27% vs 33%; P = .73). In the HFS group, the number of GPs decreased from 3.4 ± 1.1 to 1.5 ± 0.8 after the pulmonary vein isolation (P < .0001), and the decrease was smaller in the patients experiencing ER than in those without.
CONCLUSION: HFS increases the incidence of ER in patients with persistent AF despite a partial GP modification resulting from the pulmonary vein isolation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of HFS on the short-term and long-term outcomes after the ablation of persistent AF.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF were randomly assigned to either receive HFS of the left atrium (n = 15) or not (n = 15) during their electrophysiological studies. Patients receiving HFS were examined to determine whether or not a vagal response was elicited by the HFS at sites where GPs were located before and after conventional pulmonary vein isolation without any ablation targeting the GPs. Patients not receiving the HFS underwent the ablation procedure alone. The rate of recurrence of AF within 3 months of the procedure (early recurrence [ER]) and the frequency of that occurring after that period (late recurrence) were compared between the patient groups.
RESULTS: The incidence of ER occurred more frequently in patients with HFS than in those without (80% vs 40%; P = .015), whereas the occurrence of late recurrence was similar between the 2 groups (27% vs 33%; P = .73). In the HFS group, the number of GPs decreased from 3.4 ± 1.1 to 1.5 ± 0.8 after the pulmonary vein isolation (P < .0001), and the decrease was smaller in the patients experiencing ER than in those without.
CONCLUSION: HFS increases the incidence of ER in patients with persistent AF despite a partial GP modification resulting from the pulmonary vein isolation.