The journal of evidence-based dental practice · 2022
DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY TO DIAGNOSE IN VIVO/IN VITRO ROOT RESORPTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baena-de la Iglesia Teresa, Yañez-Vico Rosa Maria, Iglesias-Linares Alejandro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This review analyses the diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the in vivo/in vitro detection of external root resorption (ERR) and critically analyses current and past methods of measuring or classifying ERR in vivo/in vitro in terms of radiation doses and cumulative radiation risks.
METHODS: A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) protocol was used for a systematic review of diagnostic methods following PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019120513). A thorough and exhaustive electronic search of 6 core electronic databases was performed, applying the ISSG Search Filter Resource. The eligibility criteria were designed [problem-intervention-comparison-outcomes (PICO) statement: Population, Index test, Comparator, Outcome] and methodological quality was assessed by QUADAS-2.
RESULTS: Seventeen papers were selected from a total of 7841 articles. Six in vivo studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of ERR was 78.12% and 79.25%, respectively. The highest and lowest sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of external root resorption are 42%-98% and 49.3%-96.3%.
DISCUSSION: Most of the selected studies reported quantitative diagnoses with single linear measurements of ERR even though multislice radiographs were available. The cumulative radiation dose (μS) to radiation-sensitive structures, such as the bone marrow, brain and thyroid, was observed to increase using the 3-dimensional (3D) radiography methods reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest and lowest sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of external root resorption are 42%-98% and 49.3%-96.3%. The minimum and maximum effective doses of dental CBCT for external root resorption diagnosis are 34 μSv and 1073 μSv.
METHODS: A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) protocol was used for a systematic review of diagnostic methods following PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019120513). A thorough and exhaustive electronic search of 6 core electronic databases was performed, applying the ISSG Search Filter Resource. The eligibility criteria were designed [problem-intervention-comparison-outcomes (PICO) statement: Population, Index test, Comparator, Outcome] and methodological quality was assessed by QUADAS-2.
RESULTS: Seventeen papers were selected from a total of 7841 articles. Six in vivo studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of ERR was 78.12% and 79.25%, respectively. The highest and lowest sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of external root resorption are 42%-98% and 49.3%-96.3%.
DISCUSSION: Most of the selected studies reported quantitative diagnoses with single linear measurements of ERR even though multislice radiographs were available. The cumulative radiation dose (μS) to radiation-sensitive structures, such as the bone marrow, brain and thyroid, was observed to increase using the 3-dimensional (3D) radiography methods reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest and lowest sensitivity and specificity of CBCT for diagnosis of external root resorption are 42%-98% and 49.3%-96.3%. The minimum and maximum effective doses of dental CBCT for external root resorption diagnosis are 34 μSv and 1073 μSv.