Clinical oral implants research · 2023
Esthetics and bone changes of immediate implants with or without vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue grafting: A 2-year randomized controlled trial.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naiem Suzy Nabil, Hosny Manal, ElNahass Hani
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To compare esthetics at single immediately placed implants with and without soft tissue augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone were assigned into 2 groups: immediately placed implants with simultaneous vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue grafting (VIP-CTG) or non-grafted immediately placed implants (NG). The outcomes included: pink esthetic score (PES), gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, buccal bone changes, marginal bone loss, pain, and satisfaction.
RESULTS: Eighteen implants were included. At 2 years the mean value for PES was 12 ± 3.2 for the VIP-CTG and 12.9 ± 1.3 for the NG (p = .855). Mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = .253) and (p = .931) respectively. Clinically buccal bone showed mean bone loss of 2.03 ± 1.57 mm for VIP-CTG and 1.09 ± 1.3 mm for NG (p = .247) and radiographically showed 1.67 ± 0.84 mm at the VIP-CTG and 1.16 ± 0.47 mm at the NG (p = .118). No statistically significant difference between both groups was demonstrated regarding marginal bone level changes (p = .142), pain (p = .622), or satisfaction (p = .562) at any time point.
CONCLUSION: Simultaneous soft tissue grafting with immediate implant placement did not provide a more favorable outcome regarding esthetics or alveolar bone preservation effect. Undisturbed healing with the least surgical intervention seems to provide more favorable outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone were assigned into 2 groups: immediately placed implants with simultaneous vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue grafting (VIP-CTG) or non-grafted immediately placed implants (NG). The outcomes included: pink esthetic score (PES), gingival thickness, keratinized tissue width, buccal bone changes, marginal bone loss, pain, and satisfaction.
RESULTS: Eighteen implants were included. At 2 years the mean value for PES was 12 ± 3.2 for the VIP-CTG and 12.9 ± 1.3 for the NG (p = .855). Mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = .253) and (p = .931) respectively. Clinically buccal bone showed mean bone loss of 2.03 ± 1.57 mm for VIP-CTG and 1.09 ± 1.3 mm for NG (p = .247) and radiographically showed 1.67 ± 0.84 mm at the VIP-CTG and 1.16 ± 0.47 mm at the NG (p = .118). No statistically significant difference between both groups was demonstrated regarding marginal bone level changes (p = .142), pain (p = .622), or satisfaction (p = .562) at any time point.
CONCLUSION: Simultaneous soft tissue grafting with immediate implant placement did not provide a more favorable outcome regarding esthetics or alveolar bone preservation effect. Undisturbed healing with the least surgical intervention seems to provide more favorable outcomes.