Journal of clinical periodontology · 2023
Effect of periodontal phenotype characteristics on post-extraction dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge: A prospective case series.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Couso-Queiruga Emilio, Graham Zachary A, Peter Tabitha, Gonzalez-Martin Oscar, Galindo-Moreno Pablo, Avila-Ortiz Gustavo
Аннотация
AIM: This study was primarily aimed at assessing the effect that specific periodontal phenotypical characteristics have on alveolar ridge remodelling after tooth extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in need of extraction of a non-molar maxillary tooth were enrolled. Baseline phenotypical characteristics (i.e., mid-facial and mid-palatal soft tissue and bone thickness, and supracrestal soft tissue height [STH]) were recorded upon extraction. A set of clinical, digital imaging (linear and volumetric), and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over a 14-week healing period.
RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were screened. Forty-two subjects completed the study. Linear and volumetric bone changes, as well as vertical linear soft tissue and alveolar ridge volume (soft tissue contour) variations, were indicative of a marked dimensional reduction of the alveolar ridge over time. Horizontal facial and palatal soft tissue thickness gain was observed. Thin facial bone (≤1 mm) upon extraction, compared with thick facial bone (>1 mm), was associated with greater linear horizontal (-4.57 ± 2.31 mm vs. -2.17 ± 1.65 mm, p = .003) and vertical mid-facial (-0.95 ± 0.67 mm vs. -4.08 ± 3.52 mm, p < 0.001) and mid-palatal (-2.03 ± 2.08 mm vs. -1.12 ± 0.99 mm, p = 0.027) bone loss, as well as greater total (-34% ± 10% vs. 15% ± 6%, p < 0.001), facial (-51% ± 19% vs. 28% ± 18%, p = 0.040), and palatal bone volume reduction (-26% ± 14% vs. -8% ± 10%, p < 0.001). Aside from alveolar bone thickness, STH was also found to be a predictor of alveolar ridge resorption since this variable was directly correlated with bone volume reduction. Patient-reported discomfort scores progressively decreased over time, and the mean satisfaction upon study completion was 94.5 ± 0.83 out of 100.
CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge remodelling is a physiological phenomenon that occurs after tooth extraction. Post-extraction alveolar ridge atrophy is more marked on the facio-coronal aspect. These dimensional changes are more pronounced in sites exhibiting a thin facial bone phenotype (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02668289).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in need of extraction of a non-molar maxillary tooth were enrolled. Baseline phenotypical characteristics (i.e., mid-facial and mid-palatal soft tissue and bone thickness, and supracrestal soft tissue height [STH]) were recorded upon extraction. A set of clinical, digital imaging (linear and volumetric), and patient-reported outcomes were assessed over a 14-week healing period.
RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were screened. Forty-two subjects completed the study. Linear and volumetric bone changes, as well as vertical linear soft tissue and alveolar ridge volume (soft tissue contour) variations, were indicative of a marked dimensional reduction of the alveolar ridge over time. Horizontal facial and palatal soft tissue thickness gain was observed. Thin facial bone (≤1 mm) upon extraction, compared with thick facial bone (>1 mm), was associated with greater linear horizontal (-4.57 ± 2.31 mm vs. -2.17 ± 1.65 mm, p = .003) and vertical mid-facial (-0.95 ± 0.67 mm vs. -4.08 ± 3.52 mm, p < 0.001) and mid-palatal (-2.03 ± 2.08 mm vs. -1.12 ± 0.99 mm, p = 0.027) bone loss, as well as greater total (-34% ± 10% vs. 15% ± 6%, p < 0.001), facial (-51% ± 19% vs. 28% ± 18%, p = 0.040), and palatal bone volume reduction (-26% ± 14% vs. -8% ± 10%, p < 0.001). Aside from alveolar bone thickness, STH was also found to be a predictor of alveolar ridge resorption since this variable was directly correlated with bone volume reduction. Patient-reported discomfort scores progressively decreased over time, and the mean satisfaction upon study completion was 94.5 ± 0.83 out of 100.
CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar ridge remodelling is a physiological phenomenon that occurs after tooth extraction. Post-extraction alveolar ridge atrophy is more marked on the facio-coronal aspect. These dimensional changes are more pronounced in sites exhibiting a thin facial bone phenotype (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02668289).