MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/2229-5178.144499

Медицинская библиотека · Indian dermatology online journal · 2014

Epidemiological pattern of psoriasis, vitiligo and atopic dermatitis in India: Hospital-based point prevalence.

Kumar Sorna, Nayak Chitra S, Padhi Tanmay, Rao Gnaneshwar, Rao Ashwin, Sharma V K, Srinivas C R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The knowledge of the prevalence of common dermatoses will be useful for optimum use of valuable resources of the country.

AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the pattern and prevalence of psoriasis, vitiligo and atopic dermatitis (AD) in India.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This was a hospital-based study conducted on a single day in one medical college each in four zones of India.

RESULTS

The point prevalence of dermatological cases was 9.25%. The point prevalence of psoriasis, vitiligo and AD were 8%, 9.98% and 6.75% respectively. Chronic plaque type psoriasis was the most common (50%) clinical pattern. The most common site of involvement of psoriasis was the palms. Stable type of vitiligo was common which accounted for 65.21%. Lower lip was involved in 75% of mucosal vitiligo. Lower limbs were the most common site of onset of vitiligo. AD was most prevalent in the first decade (40.7%). Personal history of atopy was present in (59.5%) patients. Dry skin was present in 92.5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data correlates with previous hospital-based prevalence studies of psoriasis, vitiligo and AD.

Для цитирования: Kumar Sorna, Nayak Chitra S, Padhi Tanmay, Rao Gnaneshwar, Rao Ashwin, Sharma V K, Srinivas C R. Epidemiological pattern of psoriasis, vitiligo and atopic dermatitis in India: Hospital-based point prevalence.. Indian dermatology online journal. 2014. DOI: 10.4103/2229-5178.144499.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.