Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2023
Decompression of Axillary Vein: An Essential Adjunct for Advanced Lymphedema.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jeong Hyung Hwa, Yoon In Ah, Al-Shomer Feras M, Suh HyunSuk Peter, Pak ChangSik John, Neligan Peter, Hong Joon Pio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In advanced lymphedema, lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) can be a solution based on using the pressure gradient between the high-pressure lymphatics and the low-pressure veins. If the vein pressure is high, the effect of surgery will be less optimal. This study evaluated the effect of axillary vein perivascular scar release on LVA.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 40 upper limb stage 2 and 3 lymphedema patients divided into 2 groups with an average follow-up of 33 months (minimum of at least 12 months): the scar release group ( n = 25) and the control group ( n = 15). All patients underwent LVA with or without lymph node transfer. Demographic data, outcome (volumetric change and bioimpedence analysis [BIA]), and major vein (axillary, basilic, and cephalic) diameter changes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant reduction in volume and BIA parameters after LVA. The scar release group (24 of 25 with lymph node transfer and 1 without) showed statistically higher reduction of BIA analysis compared with the control group at 1, 6, and 12 months after LVA. The changes in the major veins after axilla scar release showed significant changes in all 3 veins. There was a significant correlation between cephalic vein diameter reduction and BIA measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: The release of perivascular scar in the axillary vein may result in better outcome after LVA. This is based on the finding that scar release shows correlation between cephalic vein diameter reduction and BIA measurement suggesting reduction of venous pressure in the peripheral vein increasing the pressure gradient between the lymphatic and venous system allowing better outflow after LVA.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 40 upper limb stage 2 and 3 lymphedema patients divided into 2 groups with an average follow-up of 33 months (minimum of at least 12 months): the scar release group ( n = 25) and the control group ( n = 15). All patients underwent LVA with or without lymph node transfer. Demographic data, outcome (volumetric change and bioimpedence analysis [BIA]), and major vein (axillary, basilic, and cephalic) diameter changes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant reduction in volume and BIA parameters after LVA. The scar release group (24 of 25 with lymph node transfer and 1 without) showed statistically higher reduction of BIA analysis compared with the control group at 1, 6, and 12 months after LVA. The changes in the major veins after axilla scar release showed significant changes in all 3 veins. There was a significant correlation between cephalic vein diameter reduction and BIA measurement.
CONCLUSIONS: The release of perivascular scar in the axillary vein may result in better outcome after LVA. This is based on the finding that scar release shows correlation between cephalic vein diameter reduction and BIA measurement suggesting reduction of venous pressure in the peripheral vein increasing the pressure gradient between the lymphatic and venous system allowing better outflow after LVA.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.