Efficacy of virtual plastic surgery encounters in establishment of care and surgical conversion.

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of virtual visits in converting new patients into established patients undergoing surgical treatment has not been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient retention and surgical conversion rate after an initial virtual plastic surgery consultation.

METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective review of all new plastic surgery patients seen between May and August 2020 at a single institution was conducted. The initial encounter type, chief complaint, demographics, treatment recommendation, insurance approval rate, number and modality of pre- and postoperative visits, time to procedure, follow up, and complications were recorded. Patient retention and surgery conversion rate were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

In total, the records of 1889 new patients were reviewed (1635 in-person, 254 virtual). Virtual patients were younger (44.5 ± 19.0 versus 49.5 ± 20.7 years, p < 0.001), and nearly half resided greater than 50 miles away (42% versus 16%, p < 0.001). Virtual patients more frequently presented for cosmetic surgery (14% versus 7%, p < 0.001), lymphedema (15% versus 3%, p < 0.001), and gender dysphoria (11% versus 2%, p < 0.001). In-person patients presented more often for trauma (18% versus 5%, p < 0.001), elective hand complaints (16% versus 3%, p < 0.001), and breast reconstruction (9% versus 4%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in patient retention (p = 0.45) and procedure conversion rate (p = 0.21) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine provides an opportunity to increase the practice catchment area and is as effective as in-person first encounters for establishing care and transition to surgery.