MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2174/1874205x01509010053

Медицинская библиотека · The open neurology journal · 2015

Validation Study of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Urdu Language for Pakistani Population.

Awan Safia, Shahbaz Naila, Akhtar Syed Wasim, Ahmad Arsalan, Iqbal Sadaf, Ahmed Sellal, Naqvi Haider, Wasay Mohammad

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Validation study of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Urdu language for Pakistani population.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted primarily to validate and determine the optimal cutoff score in the diagnosis of dementia among Pakistani's and study the effects of gender and education on the MMSE performance in our population.

METHODS

Four hundred participants took part in the study. Patient with dementia recruited from five major hospitals from Pakistan. The MMSE was translated into Urdu.

RESULTS

There were 61 men and 39 women in dementia group and 225 men and 75 women in the control group. The mean score of Urdu MMSE were lower in patients with dementia 18.5 ± 5.6 (range 0-30) as compared to the controls 26.8 ± 2.6 (range 7-30). This difference between groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). Educational based MMSE score below 15 yielded perfect sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

These finding confirm the influence of level of education on MMSE score and education stratified cutoff scores should be used while screening for cognitive impairment in this population.

Для цитирования: Awan Safia, Shahbaz Naila, Akhtar Syed Wasim, Ahmad Arsalan, Iqbal Sadaf, Ahmed Sellal, Naqvi Haider, Wasay Mohammad. Validation Study of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Urdu Language for Pakistani Population.. The open neurology journal. 2015. DOI: 10.2174/1874205x01509010053.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.