Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2023
Use of his prostheses by a double upper limb amputee 6 years after amputation: From aesthetic to functional considerations, a case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Noël Camille, Viton Jean-Michel, Bensoussan Laurent, Cotinat Maëva
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few studies have been published on the prosthetic management of bilateral upper limb amputees. Of particular interest is to study how a patient's use of his upper limb protheses had evolved over a 6-year period in the aim to decrease their rejection rate.
CASE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS: Mr. D had undergone a bilateral upper limb amputation and had been fitted with 7 different prostheses in the past 6 years. Multiple validate instruments and analyses were then used to monitor the patient's fitting and choices.
FINDINGS AND OUTCOMES: Initially, the left prosthesis was regarded as the dominant hand and the right one as the assistive power grip hand. However, the observational results showed that wearing only a left Greifer enabled the prosthetic user to perform the same tasks as with 2 prostheses. He has gained greater satisfaction and quality of life without losing his independence.
CONCLUSION: The patient seemed to make a functional choice over his worrying about his physical appearance in favor of the efficiency of his prosthesis, which was essential for his everyday life, when he decided to wear only nonanthropomorphic prosthesis.
CASE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS: Mr. D had undergone a bilateral upper limb amputation and had been fitted with 7 different prostheses in the past 6 years. Multiple validate instruments and analyses were then used to monitor the patient's fitting and choices.
FINDINGS AND OUTCOMES: Initially, the left prosthesis was regarded as the dominant hand and the right one as the assistive power grip hand. However, the observational results showed that wearing only a left Greifer enabled the prosthetic user to perform the same tasks as with 2 prostheses. He has gained greater satisfaction and quality of life without losing his independence.
CONCLUSION: The patient seemed to make a functional choice over his worrying about his physical appearance in favor of the efficiency of his prosthesis, which was essential for his everyday life, when he decided to wear only nonanthropomorphic prosthesis.