MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09638288.2023.2270908

Медицинская библиотека · Disability and rehabilitation · 2023

Quality of life in young people with limb loss: a systematic review.

Maciver Marina, Dixon Diane, Powell Daniel

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Life after any amputation can be significantly altered and can have a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). However, most of the evidence base involves older aged amputees, therefore there is a lack of understanding about the impact of amputation on QoL and the factors that predict QoL in younger amputees. The aim of this review is to identify the factors that predict QoL in young amputees.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science were searched to identify articles that measured QoL in young amputees. Articles were independently assessed by two assessors. Data was extracted from the selected articles and a narrative synthesis performed.

RESULTS

18 articles were included in this review. QoL outcome measures varied between studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. This review identified, gender, age, cause of amputation, level of amputation, phantom pain, ability to use a prosthesis, physical function, depression, anxiety, body image, type of prosthesis as predictors of QoL.

CONCLUSION

This review identified modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of QoL in young amputees. Future research needs to focus on exploring the modifiable predictors of QoL as these are the aspects that can be improved to enhance QoL.

Для цитирования: Maciver Marina, Dixon Diane, Powell Daniel. Quality of life in young people with limb loss: a systematic review.. Disability and rehabilitation. 2023. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2270908.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.