Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2015
Structural Measurements for Monitoring Change in Glaucoma: Comparing Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness With Minimum Rim Width and Area.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gardiner Stuart K, Boey Pui Yi, Yang Hongli, Fortune Brad, Burgoyne Claude F, Demirel Shaban
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Minimum rim width (MRW) and area (MRA) have been introduced as anatomically defensible measures of neuroretinal rim tissue observable using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). They have been reported to change earlier than retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in glaucoma. This study sought to determine which is better to distinguish subsequent change from variability, using the previously described longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR).
METHODS: Data from 157 eyes of 157 participants with high-risk ocular hypertension or non-end-stage glaucoma (mean deviation [MD] from -22 to +3 dB) were used. Participants were tested approximately every 6 months for at least six visits. For each eye, MRW, MRA, and RNFLT were regressed linearly against time. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio for each eye was defined as the rate of change over time (signal) divided by the standard deviation of residuals from this trend (noise). These were compared between parameters using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: The median LSNRs were -0.58y⁻¹ for RNFLT (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval -0.69 to -0.48y⁻¹); -0.44y⁻¹ (-0.59 to -0.32y⁻¹) for MRW; and -0.23y⁻¹ (-0.32 to -0.08y⁻¹) for MRA. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratios were significantly more negative for RNFLT than for MRW (P = 0.025) or for MRA (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by SDOCT had a better LSNR than MRW or MRA. Although MRW and MRA may be more sensitive for early detection of glaucomatous damage, these data suggest that RNFLT may be preferable for monitoring change.
METHODS: Data from 157 eyes of 157 participants with high-risk ocular hypertension or non-end-stage glaucoma (mean deviation [MD] from -22 to +3 dB) were used. Participants were tested approximately every 6 months for at least six visits. For each eye, MRW, MRA, and RNFLT were regressed linearly against time. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio for each eye was defined as the rate of change over time (signal) divided by the standard deviation of residuals from this trend (noise). These were compared between parameters using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: The median LSNRs were -0.58y⁻¹ for RNFLT (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval -0.69 to -0.48y⁻¹); -0.44y⁻¹ (-0.59 to -0.32y⁻¹) for MRW; and -0.23y⁻¹ (-0.32 to -0.08y⁻¹) for MRA. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratios were significantly more negative for RNFLT than for MRW (P = 0.025) or for MRA (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by SDOCT had a better LSNR than MRW or MRA. Although MRW and MRA may be more sensitive for early detection of glaucomatous damage, these data suggest that RNFLT may be preferable for monitoring change.