Acta cardiologica · 2024
Diagnostic and prognostic yields of ambulatory blood pressure measurements in haemodialysis patients: a 6-year longitudinal study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huart J, Vanderweckene P, Seidel L, Bovy C, Delanaye P, Dubois B, Grosch S, Xhignesse P, Saint-Remy A, Krzesinski J-M, Jouret F
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) control in haemodialysis (HD) patients is essential. Peri-dialytic BP levels do not accurately diagnose hypertension or predict the cardiovascular (CV) mortality.
METHODS: In this study, we recruited 43 adult patients who had been on chronic HD for ≥3 months. Seven-day home BP monitoring (HBPM) (values of Day1 discarded) and 44-h interdialytic ambulatory BP monitoring (iABPM) were performed. Pre- and post-dialysis BP levels were measured during the 6 dialysis sessions prior to iABPM. A 6-year follow-up was carried out to assess all-cause and CV mortality.
RESULTS: In patients considered as normotensive in pre-dialysis (n = 17), masked hypertension was found in 24% and 29% on the basis of iABPM and HBPM, respectively. Conversely, among hypertensive patients in pre-dialysis (n = 26), 'white-coat' hypertension was noted in 23% either by iABPM or HBPM. After a 6-year follow-up, 25 patients were deceased including 6 patients from CV causes. Day-time systolic BP measured by iABPM was associated with all-cause mortality in an adjusted model for age and gender (p = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: In chronic HD patients, 44-h iABPM and 6-day HBPM show a reliable concordance and help to re-classify ∼25% of cases miscategorised based on pre-dialysis measurements. Day-time systolic BP levels using iABPM were significantly associated with 6-year all-cause mortality.
METHODS: In this study, we recruited 43 adult patients who had been on chronic HD for ≥3 months. Seven-day home BP monitoring (HBPM) (values of Day1 discarded) and 44-h interdialytic ambulatory BP monitoring (iABPM) were performed. Pre- and post-dialysis BP levels were measured during the 6 dialysis sessions prior to iABPM. A 6-year follow-up was carried out to assess all-cause and CV mortality.
RESULTS: In patients considered as normotensive in pre-dialysis (n = 17), masked hypertension was found in 24% and 29% on the basis of iABPM and HBPM, respectively. Conversely, among hypertensive patients in pre-dialysis (n = 26), 'white-coat' hypertension was noted in 23% either by iABPM or HBPM. After a 6-year follow-up, 25 patients were deceased including 6 patients from CV causes. Day-time systolic BP measured by iABPM was associated with all-cause mortality in an adjusted model for age and gender (p = 0.045).
CONCLUSION: In chronic HD patients, 44-h iABPM and 6-day HBPM show a reliable concordance and help to re-classify ∼25% of cases miscategorised based on pre-dialysis measurements. Day-time systolic BP levels using iABPM were significantly associated with 6-year all-cause mortality.