Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2007
A new simplified method for calculating mean mitral pressure gradient.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cui Wei, Dai Ruping, Zhang Gejun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mean mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG) is one of the key measures of the severity of mitral stenosis. The method for calculating MVPG, however, is complex and time consuming. The purpose of this study is to establish a new simple method for calculating MVPG.
METHODS: Hemodynamic data were analyzed in 105 patients who underwent percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV). A new simplified method for calculating mitral pressure gradient was proposed, i.e., mean MVPG = MLAP - LVEDP/2, where MLAP is mean left atrial pressure, and LVEDP is left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
RESULTS: MVPGs derived from the standard and the new method were 13.28 +/- 7.42 mm Hg and 13.50 +/- 7.93 mm Hg, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the values of these two methods (P = 0.065). The MVPG derived from the new simplified method correlated closely with that calculated by the standard approach (r = 0.975, P < 0.001). Moreover, there was no significant difference between mitral valve areas (MVA) derived from the standard and the new approach either before or after PBMV in the 38 patients in whom cardiac output was measured.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that mitral pressure gradient can be calculated reliably with our new simplified method.
METHODS: Hemodynamic data were analyzed in 105 patients who underwent percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV). A new simplified method for calculating mitral pressure gradient was proposed, i.e., mean MVPG = MLAP - LVEDP/2, where MLAP is mean left atrial pressure, and LVEDP is left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
RESULTS: MVPGs derived from the standard and the new method were 13.28 +/- 7.42 mm Hg and 13.50 +/- 7.93 mm Hg, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the values of these two methods (P = 0.065). The MVPG derived from the new simplified method correlated closely with that calculated by the standard approach (r = 0.975, P < 0.001). Moreover, there was no significant difference between mitral valve areas (MVA) derived from the standard and the new approach either before or after PBMV in the 38 patients in whom cardiac output was measured.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that mitral pressure gradient can be calculated reliably with our new simplified method.