Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Lu-177-DOTATATE and Monitoring with Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT in Patients with Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kunte Sophie Carina, Wenter Vera U, Holzgreve Adrien, Sheikh Gabriel T, Widjaja Liam, Gildehaus Franz Josef, Lindner Simon, Schirrmacher Ralf, Spitzweg Christine, Auernhammer Christoph J, Werner Rudolf A, Zacherl Mathias J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu-177-DOTATATE is an established treatment option for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and has been extended to other somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing tumors. We aimed to determine its efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).
METHODS: Seven radioiodine-refractory DTC patients undergoing at least two cycles of PRRT were included. Patients were subdivided into continuous treatment (defined as sequential application of PRRT; 5/7 (71.4%)) vs. discontinuous treatment (with at least one-year PRRT-free interval; 2/7 (28.6%)). Baseline SSTR PET was analyzed to determine patients' eligibility for PRRT. Response was assessed by tumor control as defined by stable (± 30.0%) or decreasing (≥ 30.0%) total tumor volume (PET-derived TTV), thyroglobulin (Tg) and RECIST 1.1 criteria.
RESULTS: SSTR PET showed discernible high uptake (maximum standardized uptake values, 10.4 ± 8.6) in metastases, in particular in the skeleton. Continuous PRRT showed variable tumor control (stable disease / response; TTV: 3/5 (60.0%); Tg: 2/5 (40.0%); RECIST 1.1: 3/5 (60.0%)). All patients undergoing discontinuous PRRT exhibited concordant stable disease upon first follow-up and renewed tumor control upon reinitiating PRRT (RECIST 1.1; decreasing TTV and Tg levels). No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3-5 events occured in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In advanced radioiodine-refractory DTC, PRRT may be beneficial even after treatment interruptions, without major side effects. Given the small cohort and retrospective design, further prospective studies are needed to optimize PRRT strategies in DTC, in particular in a rechallenge scenario.
METHODS: Seven radioiodine-refractory DTC patients undergoing at least two cycles of PRRT were included. Patients were subdivided into continuous treatment (defined as sequential application of PRRT; 5/7 (71.4%)) vs. discontinuous treatment (with at least one-year PRRT-free interval; 2/7 (28.6%)). Baseline SSTR PET was analyzed to determine patients' eligibility for PRRT. Response was assessed by tumor control as defined by stable (± 30.0%) or decreasing (≥ 30.0%) total tumor volume (PET-derived TTV), thyroglobulin (Tg) and RECIST 1.1 criteria.
RESULTS: SSTR PET showed discernible high uptake (maximum standardized uptake values, 10.4 ± 8.6) in metastases, in particular in the skeleton. Continuous PRRT showed variable tumor control (stable disease / response; TTV: 3/5 (60.0%); Tg: 2/5 (40.0%); RECIST 1.1: 3/5 (60.0%)). All patients undergoing discontinuous PRRT exhibited concordant stable disease upon first follow-up and renewed tumor control upon reinitiating PRRT (RECIST 1.1; decreasing TTV and Tg levels). No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3-5 events occured in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In advanced radioiodine-refractory DTC, PRRT may be beneficial even after treatment interruptions, without major side effects. Given the small cohort and retrospective design, further prospective studies are needed to optimize PRRT strategies in DTC, in particular in a rechallenge scenario.