Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica · 2015
[Training in laparoscopy and appendicitis].
СтатьяАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramos J L, Villanueva A, Garay J, Suñol M, Villalón F, Urbistondo A, Jiménez J, Rezola E, Eizaguirre I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In order to improve laparoscopic skills, appendectomy is the most common procedure because of its high frequency and low difficulty. In spite of that, during the learning curve (each surgeon´s first 35 interventions) the incidence of complications may increase, so improvement in training means a bigger risk for some patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed major complications (intra-abdominal abscess, intestinal occlusion, hemorrhage) of 1,710 appendectomies performed at our service between 1997 and 2013. We divided them in three groups: open appendectomy (OA, n= 1,258), laparoscopic appendectomy during the learning curve (LDC, n= 154) and laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve (LAC, n= 298). In addition, we distinguish between simple appendicitis (n= 1,233) and peritonitis (n= 477).
RESULTS: In the OA group we detected110/1,258 major complications (8.7%), 28/154 major complications (18.2%) in the LDC group and 19/298 (6.4%) in the LAC group (p<0.05 LDC vs OA and LAC). In the simple appendicitis group, we found 13/889 major complications (1.5%) in OA, 3/115 (2.6%) in LDC group and 2/229 (0.9%) in LAC group (p= ns LDC vs OA and LAC). In the peritonitis group, 97/369 (26.3%) major complications were found in OA group, 25/39 (64%) in LDC group and 17/69 (24.6%) in LAC group (p<0.05 LDC vs OA and LAC).
CONCLUSIONS: Educational purpose laparoscopic appendectomy must be used in simple appendicitis cases.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed major complications (intra-abdominal abscess, intestinal occlusion, hemorrhage) of 1,710 appendectomies performed at our service between 1997 and 2013. We divided them in three groups: open appendectomy (OA, n= 1,258), laparoscopic appendectomy during the learning curve (LDC, n= 154) and laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve (LAC, n= 298). In addition, we distinguish between simple appendicitis (n= 1,233) and peritonitis (n= 477).
RESULTS: In the OA group we detected110/1,258 major complications (8.7%), 28/154 major complications (18.2%) in the LDC group and 19/298 (6.4%) in the LAC group (p<0.05 LDC vs OA and LAC). In the simple appendicitis group, we found 13/889 major complications (1.5%) in OA, 3/115 (2.6%) in LDC group and 2/229 (0.9%) in LAC group (p= ns LDC vs OA and LAC). In the peritonitis group, 97/369 (26.3%) major complications were found in OA group, 25/39 (64%) in LDC group and 17/69 (24.6%) in LAC group (p<0.05 LDC vs OA and LAC).
CONCLUSIONS: Educational purpose laparoscopic appendectomy must be used in simple appendicitis cases.