Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2005
Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Djavidani Behrus, Debl Kurt, Lenhart Markus, Seitz Johannes, Paetzel Christian, Schmid Franz X, Nitz Wolfgang R, Feuerbach Stefan, Riegger Günter, Luchner Andreas
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether noninvasive planimetry of the mitral valve area (MVA) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is feasible and reliable in patients with mitral stenosis (MS).
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of MVA is particularly important for the management of patients with valvular stenosis. Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of MS include echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac catheterization (CATH).
METHODS: In 22 patients with suspected or known MS, planimetry of MVA was performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner using a breath-hold balanced gradient echo sequence (true FISP). Data were compared with echocardiographically determined MVA (ECHO-MVA, n = 22), as well as with invasively calculated MVA by the Gorlin-formula at (CATH-MVA, n = 17).
RESULTS: The correlation between MRI- and CATH-MVA was 0.89 (p < 0.0001), and the correlation between MRI- and ECHO-MVA was 0.81 (p < 0.0001). The MRI-MVA slightly overestimated CATH-MVA by 5.0% (1.60 +/- 0.45 cm(2) vs. 1.52 +/- 0.49 cm(2), p = NS) and ECHO-MVA by 8.1% (1.61 +/- 0.42 cm(2) vs. 1.48 +/- 0.42 cm(2), p < 0.05). On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a value of MRI-MVA below 1.65 cm(2) indicated mitral stenosis (CATH-MVA < or =1.5 cm(2)), with a good sensitivity and specificity (89% and 75%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance planimetry of the mitral valve orifice in mitral stenosis offers a reliable and safe method for noninvasive quantification of mitral stenosis. In the clinical management of patients with mitral stenosis, it has to be considered that planimetry by MRI slightly overestimates MVA, as compared with MVA calculated echocardiographically and at catheterization.
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of MVA is particularly important for the management of patients with valvular stenosis. Current standard techniques for assessing the severity of MS include echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac catheterization (CATH).
METHODS: In 22 patients with suspected or known MS, planimetry of MVA was performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner using a breath-hold balanced gradient echo sequence (true FISP). Data were compared with echocardiographically determined MVA (ECHO-MVA, n = 22), as well as with invasively calculated MVA by the Gorlin-formula at (CATH-MVA, n = 17).
RESULTS: The correlation between MRI- and CATH-MVA was 0.89 (p < 0.0001), and the correlation between MRI- and ECHO-MVA was 0.81 (p < 0.0001). The MRI-MVA slightly overestimated CATH-MVA by 5.0% (1.60 +/- 0.45 cm(2) vs. 1.52 +/- 0.49 cm(2), p = NS) and ECHO-MVA by 8.1% (1.61 +/- 0.42 cm(2) vs. 1.48 +/- 0.42 cm(2), p < 0.05). On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a value of MRI-MVA below 1.65 cm(2) indicated mitral stenosis (CATH-MVA < or =1.5 cm(2)), with a good sensitivity and specificity (89% and 75%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance planimetry of the mitral valve orifice in mitral stenosis offers a reliable and safe method for noninvasive quantification of mitral stenosis. In the clinical management of patients with mitral stenosis, it has to be considered that planimetry by MRI slightly overestimates MVA, as compared with MVA calculated echocardiographically and at catheterization.