Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2000
[Wound or suture insufficiency complicating penetrating keratoplasty].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nölle B, Halene M A, Grütters G, Duncker G I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With regard to penetrating keratoplasty methods to culture corneal donor tissues, microsurgical techniques, HLA typing and understanding of basic mechanisms in inflammation and especially graft rejection, and postoperative treatment schedules have been improved in recent years. This now enables successful penetrating keratoplasty in many more patients than previously performed. However, in rare cases relevant problems in wound closure may appear.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standardized treatment protocol was applied to 1,253 penetrating keratoplasties performed in a single center. Patients were continuously followed up. Simple leakage after corneal grafting was not further analyzed if conservative treatment or additional sutures achieved sufficient wound closure. In 21 cases, however, the causes of large wound dehiscence after corneal grafting were analyzed.
RESULTS: During the first week early problems in suturing penetrating keratoplasty in five patients were associated with the instability of the recipients' corneal stroma (stromal thinning in keratoconus or corneal herpes, suture problems in keratomalacia, active herpes keratitis, corneal burns, or rheumatic diseases). Long-term complications in 16 patients were associated with alcoholism, herpes keratitis, rheumatic disorders or traumatic suture defects. Overall, nine patients lost functionally or even anatomically one eye because of wound dehiscence after corneal grafting.
CONCLUSIONS: When penetrating keratoplasty is indicated, special attention should be given to (1) the compliance of the patient, (2) sufficient treatment of herpes keratitis or other infections, (3) adequate immunosuppression in autoimmune corneal inflammation, (4) double running continuous sutures as primary suture with sometimes additional single sutures to stabilize the graft, and (5) surgery in time.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standardized treatment protocol was applied to 1,253 penetrating keratoplasties performed in a single center. Patients were continuously followed up. Simple leakage after corneal grafting was not further analyzed if conservative treatment or additional sutures achieved sufficient wound closure. In 21 cases, however, the causes of large wound dehiscence after corneal grafting were analyzed.
RESULTS: During the first week early problems in suturing penetrating keratoplasty in five patients were associated with the instability of the recipients' corneal stroma (stromal thinning in keratoconus or corneal herpes, suture problems in keratomalacia, active herpes keratitis, corneal burns, or rheumatic diseases). Long-term complications in 16 patients were associated with alcoholism, herpes keratitis, rheumatic disorders or traumatic suture defects. Overall, nine patients lost functionally or even anatomically one eye because of wound dehiscence after corneal grafting.
CONCLUSIONS: When penetrating keratoplasty is indicated, special attention should be given to (1) the compliance of the patient, (2) sufficient treatment of herpes keratitis or other infections, (3) adequate immunosuppression in autoimmune corneal inflammation, (4) double running continuous sutures as primary suture with sometimes additional single sutures to stabilize the graft, and (5) surgery in time.