The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc · 1997
Alignment effects in videokeratography of keratoconus.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chan J S, Mandell R B
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the effects of corneal apex decentration on videokeratography in subjects with keratoconus. We controlled corneal apex decentration by first locating the cone apex position and then shifting the fixation position by known amounts relative to the videokeratograph axis.
METHODS: We evaluated the effect of keratoconus apex position on videokeratography by measuring 28 eyes (17 subjects) at 4 corneal positions: the vertex normal, apex, and 1 mm or 2 mm above the apex.
RESULTS: When compared to the apex alignment values, the radius of 1 mm (mean difference: 0.27 mm; SD +/- 0.20 mm) and 2 mm (mean difference: 0.82 mm; SD +/- 0.50 mm). The corneal toricity was greater at apex alignment than at the 1 mm (mean: -0.35 D; SD +/- 1.76 D) and 2 mm (mean: 0.62 D; SD +/- 3.23 D) decentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Decentration of the corneal apex in keratoconus produces significant errors in videokeratography when using the standard alignment rather than alignment with the apex. When there is a decentered cone apex, videokeratograph power errors are greater with the standard (sagittal) power map than with the instantaneous (tangential) power map. The standard power map produces values for the apex position that are about 50% too high and values for the apex power that are from 10 to 40% too low. Most cone shapes have significant toricity that is often not detected with standard videokeratograph alignment.
METHODS: We evaluated the effect of keratoconus apex position on videokeratography by measuring 28 eyes (17 subjects) at 4 corneal positions: the vertex normal, apex, and 1 mm or 2 mm above the apex.
RESULTS: When compared to the apex alignment values, the radius of 1 mm (mean difference: 0.27 mm; SD +/- 0.20 mm) and 2 mm (mean difference: 0.82 mm; SD +/- 0.50 mm). The corneal toricity was greater at apex alignment than at the 1 mm (mean: -0.35 D; SD +/- 1.76 D) and 2 mm (mean: 0.62 D; SD +/- 3.23 D) decentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Decentration of the corneal apex in keratoconus produces significant errors in videokeratography when using the standard alignment rather than alignment with the apex. When there is a decentered cone apex, videokeratograph power errors are greater with the standard (sagittal) power map than with the instantaneous (tangential) power map. The standard power map produces values for the apex position that are about 50% too high and values for the apex power that are from 10 to 40% too low. Most cone shapes have significant toricity that is often not detected with standard videokeratograph alignment.