Journal of endodontics · 2010
Periradicular regeneration after endodontic surgery with calcium-enriched mixture cement in dogs.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asgary Saeed, Eghbal Mohammad Jafar, Ehsani Sara
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the response of periradicular tissues to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as root-end fillings and to analyze hard tissue healing after periradicular surgery.
METHODS: Intentional periradicular lesions were induced in 32 premolar teeth in 4 beagle dogs. The root canals were prepared, dried, and obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha with sealer, and the coronal access cavities were filled with amalgam. After surgical exposure of the apices, 2-3 mm of the apical root was resected, and root-end cavities were ultrasonically prepared. The root-end cavities were randomly filled with MTA or CEM cement. After 2 months, the animals were killed; tissue blocks were removed and prepared for histologic examination. Hard tissue healing including cementum and new bone formation in addition to concentration and extent of inflammation were evaluated.
RESULTS: Eight samples were excluded. The major finding was the cementum deposition adjacent to MTA in 11 of 12 samples and CEM cement in 10 of 12 samples. With one-way analysis of variance, no significant difference was observed between the periradicular tissue response to tested materials.
CONCLUSIONS: CEM cement and MTA were associated with regenerative periapical tissue response when used as root-end filling biomaterials.
METHODS: Intentional periradicular lesions were induced in 32 premolar teeth in 4 beagle dogs. The root canals were prepared, dried, and obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha with sealer, and the coronal access cavities were filled with amalgam. After surgical exposure of the apices, 2-3 mm of the apical root was resected, and root-end cavities were ultrasonically prepared. The root-end cavities were randomly filled with MTA or CEM cement. After 2 months, the animals were killed; tissue blocks were removed and prepared for histologic examination. Hard tissue healing including cementum and new bone formation in addition to concentration and extent of inflammation were evaluated.
RESULTS: Eight samples were excluded. The major finding was the cementum deposition adjacent to MTA in 11 of 12 samples and CEM cement in 10 of 12 samples. With one-way analysis of variance, no significant difference was observed between the periradicular tissue response to tested materials.
CONCLUSIONS: CEM cement and MTA were associated with regenerative periapical tissue response when used as root-end filling biomaterials.