Journal of dentistry · 2009
Hardness, elasticity and ultrastructure of primary tooth dentin bonded with a self-reinforcing one-step self-etch adhesive.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hosoya Y, Tay F R, Ono T, Miyazaki M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the interfacial quality of sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin bonded with a self-reinforcing one-step self-etch adhesive.
METHODS: Non-carious, sound dentin was prepared with water-cooled high-speed diamond burs. Caries-infected dentin was removed with water-cooled low-speed round steel burs and hand instrument. Dentin was bonded with Bond Force (Tokuyama Dental). A nano-indentation tester was employed for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y) of resin-dentin interface. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with a SEM/EDX, and with a TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage.
RESULTS: In the comparison of the H and Y values between the interfacial dentin and the underlying mineralized dentin, no significant difference was seen in caries-affected dentin, however, the values of the interfacial dentin were significantly lower in sound dentin. The H value of the interfacial dentin of sound dentin was significantly lower than that of caries-affected dentin with significantly higher Ca content. No significant difference was observed in the Y values of the interfacial dentin of the two substrates. For both sound and caries-affected dentin, TEM revealed silver deposits in the interfacial dentin and adhesive layer, and smear layer remained within the resin-dentin interface. However, Ca and P contents of the adhesive layer at 10mum above the dentin surface were the same as those present in the interfacial dentin.
CONCLUSIONS: Both for sound teeth and caries teeth, Bond Force does not prevent the nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.
METHODS: Non-carious, sound dentin was prepared with water-cooled high-speed diamond burs. Caries-infected dentin was removed with water-cooled low-speed round steel burs and hand instrument. Dentin was bonded with Bond Force (Tokuyama Dental). A nano-indentation tester was employed for determination of hardness (H) and Young's modulus (Y) of resin-dentin interface. Similar resin-dentin interfaces were examined with a SEM/EDX, and with a TEM using ammoniacal silver nitrate tracer for nanoleakage.
RESULTS: In the comparison of the H and Y values between the interfacial dentin and the underlying mineralized dentin, no significant difference was seen in caries-affected dentin, however, the values of the interfacial dentin were significantly lower in sound dentin. The H value of the interfacial dentin of sound dentin was significantly lower than that of caries-affected dentin with significantly higher Ca content. No significant difference was observed in the Y values of the interfacial dentin of the two substrates. For both sound and caries-affected dentin, TEM revealed silver deposits in the interfacial dentin and adhesive layer, and smear layer remained within the resin-dentin interface. However, Ca and P contents of the adhesive layer at 10mum above the dentin surface were the same as those present in the interfacial dentin.
CONCLUSIONS: Both for sound teeth and caries teeth, Bond Force does not prevent the nanoleakage along the resin-dentin interface.