BMC oral health · 2025
Milled in versus round bar for mini implant retained mandibular overdentures: a 8-year retrospective radiographic study of peri-implant bone changes and posterior ridge resorption.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El-Khamisy Nermeen El Sayed, Emera Radwa Mohsen Kamal, Awad Heba Nabil
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective radiography study's main objective was to compare round and milled bars for mandibular overdentures assisted by 4 mini-dental implants (MDI) on peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL)and posterior mandibular ridge resorption(PRR) after 8 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty male Participants in a retrospective analysis were treated between 2016 and 2024 who had four interforaminal mini implants supporting an overdenture on a milled bar. Two equal groups of 15 patients each were randomly assigned to receive mandibular overdentures: Group I received overdentures retained by milled bars, while Group II received overdentures retained by round joint bars. After an 8-year follow-up period, a comparison between the two bar designs attachment used for IODs retention. The evaluation of the posterior ridge resorption (PRR) and peri-implant marginal bone loss(MBL) was done after three years (T3), five years(T5), and eight years later (T8)after insertion. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program for Windows (Standard version 24).
RESULTS: Compared to Group II, Group I's MBL was noticeably higher. As time went on, MBL rose noticeably for both groups. At certain intervals, Group II's PRR was significantly higher than its Group I.
CONCLUSIONS: The design of the anchorage system has a major impact on posterior ridge resorption and peri-implant bone loss when four mini-implants are utilized to anchor mandibular overdentures.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As mini implants are often seen as a cost-effective solution for patients with limited bone, it is important to understand their long-term performance to make more informed decisions in clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: (NCT06185283). Retrospectively registered on (29-12-2023).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty male Participants in a retrospective analysis were treated between 2016 and 2024 who had four interforaminal mini implants supporting an overdenture on a milled bar. Two equal groups of 15 patients each were randomly assigned to receive mandibular overdentures: Group I received overdentures retained by milled bars, while Group II received overdentures retained by round joint bars. After an 8-year follow-up period, a comparison between the two bar designs attachment used for IODs retention. The evaluation of the posterior ridge resorption (PRR) and peri-implant marginal bone loss(MBL) was done after three years (T3), five years(T5), and eight years later (T8)after insertion. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program for Windows (Standard version 24).
RESULTS: Compared to Group II, Group I's MBL was noticeably higher. As time went on, MBL rose noticeably for both groups. At certain intervals, Group II's PRR was significantly higher than its Group I.
CONCLUSIONS: The design of the anchorage system has a major impact on posterior ridge resorption and peri-implant bone loss when four mini-implants are utilized to anchor mandibular overdentures.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As mini implants are often seen as a cost-effective solution for patients with limited bone, it is important to understand their long-term performance to make more informed decisions in clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: (NCT06185283). Retrospectively registered on (29-12-2023).