Antiviral research · 2019
In-depth genomic analyses identified novel letermovir resistance-associated substitutions in the cytomegalovirus UL56 and UL89 gene products.
Клиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Komatsu Takashi E, Hodowanec Aimee C, Colberg-Poley Anamaris M, Pikis Andreas, Singer Mary E, O'Rear Julian J, Donaldson Eric F
Аннотация
Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) terminase inhibitor recently approved in the United States for prophylaxis of HCMV infection or disease in adult HCMV-seropositive recipients [R+] of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In the registrational trial, the rate of clinically significant HCMV infection, defined as the development of HCMV DNAemia leading to preemptive antiviral therapy or the diagnosis of HCMV end-organ disease, through 24 weeks post-transplant, was significantly lower among subjects who received letermovir prophylaxis through 14 weeks post-transplant compared to those who received placebo. We performed independent analyses of the HCMV nucleotide sequencing data generated by next-generation sequencing from this phase 3 registrational trial of letermovir to identify viral genetic characteristics associated with virologic failure during and following letermovir prophylaxis. The pUL56 substitutions V236M, E237G, and C325W, identified at previously known resistance-associated positions, were detected in the virus of subjects who were treated with letermovir and failed letermovir prophylaxis. Several additional substitutions were detected in pUL56 and pUL89, and further characterization is needed to determine if any of these substitutions are clinically relevant. The analyses reported herein were conducted to confirm sponsor-reported drug-resistance pathways, to assess the frequency of resistance, and to better understand the risk of prophylaxis failures and treatment-emergent drug resistance.