Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2012
[The colocutaneous fistula - a rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Heuss L T, Spalinger R
Аннотация
HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 43-year-old woman with spastic tetraparesis, mental retardation and long-term tube feeding was admitted for a replacement of the PEG tube, 15 months after placement and regular use of her first feeding tube. New problems had occurred with local infection and a suspected leakage. The gastrostoma showed a local erythema and increased secretion of putrid fluids, furthermore a tendency to diarrhea had developed. Otherwise the abdomen was inconspicuous.
INVESTIGATIONS: All routinely achieved blood tests were normal. Gastroscopy revealed a mucosal scar with a small fistula instead of the expected tip of the PEG tube. A CT scan demonstrated displacement of the tip into the transverse colon.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: The displaced PEG tube was removed by colonoscopy. After laparoscopic occlusion of the colocutaneous fistula with a surgical stapler and clearing of further adhesions a new PEG was inserted endoscopically during the same operation with laparoscopic guidance through the pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSION: The development of a colocutaneous fistula as a result of an unperceived perforation is a rare complication of a PEG placement. Despite of the notable mechanism that the tip of the tube erodes the gastric wall and penetrates into the adjacent colon, the clinic is often oligosymptomatic and can easily been missed.
INVESTIGATIONS: All routinely achieved blood tests were normal. Gastroscopy revealed a mucosal scar with a small fistula instead of the expected tip of the PEG tube. A CT scan demonstrated displacement of the tip into the transverse colon.
TREATMENT AND COURSE: The displaced PEG tube was removed by colonoscopy. After laparoscopic occlusion of the colocutaneous fistula with a surgical stapler and clearing of further adhesions a new PEG was inserted endoscopically during the same operation with laparoscopic guidance through the pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSION: The development of a colocutaneous fistula as a result of an unperceived perforation is a rare complication of a PEG placement. Despite of the notable mechanism that the tip of the tube erodes the gastric wall and penetrates into the adjacent colon, the clinic is often oligosymptomatic and can easily been missed.