Danish medical journal · 2012
Acceptable results after self-expanding metallic stent treatment for dysphagia in non-resectable oesophageal cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bjerring Ole Steen, Pless Torsten, Fristrup Claus, Mortensen Michael Bau
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is the most common symptom of malignant obstruction in the oesophagus and at the gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) region, and the relief of dysphagia plays a major role in palliative treatment of this condition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the need for and nature of re-intervention after self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) insertion in patients who were palliated for cancer of the oesophagus or GEJ.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At a third-level referral centre in Denmark, all SEMS procedures were prospectively registered for SEMS characteristics and procedural events and data regarding re-interventions and survival were retrieved retrospectively in a six-year inclusion period.
RESULTS: A total of 108 stents were inserted into 87 patients (63 males and 23 females) with a median age of 71 years (range: 41-94 years). The primary SEMS used was Ultraflex in 77, Cook or Choo in seven and Wallstent in three cases. All but one SEMS were successfully placed, and no perforations occurred. Fifty patients had their dysphagia scores recorded. The average score before and after stent insertion was 2.4 and 0.8, respectively, (p < 0.01). Two-thirds of the patients needed late re-interventions. The most common problem was tissue/tumour ingrowth (n = 40). Seven patients (8%) experienced stent migration. The average re-intervention rate was 2.8 per patient. The median survival after SEMS was 116 days (range 2-866 days). The median time to first re-intervention was 44 days.
CONCLUSION: SEMS treatment was a safe and effective palliation of malignant obstruction in the oesophagus and GEJ region, but the procedure was associated with a frequent need for re-interventions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At a third-level referral centre in Denmark, all SEMS procedures were prospectively registered for SEMS characteristics and procedural events and data regarding re-interventions and survival were retrieved retrospectively in a six-year inclusion period.
RESULTS: A total of 108 stents were inserted into 87 patients (63 males and 23 females) with a median age of 71 years (range: 41-94 years). The primary SEMS used was Ultraflex in 77, Cook or Choo in seven and Wallstent in three cases. All but one SEMS were successfully placed, and no perforations occurred. Fifty patients had their dysphagia scores recorded. The average score before and after stent insertion was 2.4 and 0.8, respectively, (p < 0.01). Two-thirds of the patients needed late re-interventions. The most common problem was tissue/tumour ingrowth (n = 40). Seven patients (8%) experienced stent migration. The average re-intervention rate was 2.8 per patient. The median survival after SEMS was 116 days (range 2-866 days). The median time to first re-intervention was 44 days.
CONCLUSION: SEMS treatment was a safe and effective palliation of malignant obstruction in the oesophagus and GEJ region, but the procedure was associated with a frequent need for re-interventions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArgon Plasma CoagulationCarcinoma, Squamous CellDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricStentsSurvival Analysis