Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2011
Gastrostomy tube placement in gastric remnant at gastric bypass: a rat model for selective gut stimulation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eldar Shai, Heneghan Helen M, Dan Olivia, Kirwan John P, Schauer Philip R, Brethauer Stacy A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery achieves high remission rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese diabetic patients. It has been hypothesized that the changes in bowel nutrient exposure after RYGB results in altered release of gut hormones and improved glucose homeostasis. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of, and report on, our technique and initial experience with selective gut stimulation in a gastric bypass rat model at an academic medical center in the United States.
METHODS: We performed RYGB with simultaneous placement of a gastrostomy tube in the excluded gastric remnant in 8 obese Sprague-Dawley rats. A second group of 8 obese Sprague-Dawley rats underwent gastrostomy tube placement without gastric bypass and served as the controls. Each rat was tested for oral glucose tolerance preoperatively. On postoperative days 14 and 28, glucose tolerance was re-evaluated using the oral and gastrostomy tube routes.
RESULTS: The gastrostomy tubes were successfully inserted in all the rats with no tube-related complications. The area under the curve after oral glucose gavage decreased significantly after gastric bypass (P = .01 at 14 d and P = .003 at 28 d). The gastric remnant glucose gavage after RYGB essentially reversed the effects of surgery on glucose metabolism. The areas under the curve showed no significant differences in the control group between the preoperative and postoperative oral or tube results.
CONCLUSION: Placing a gastrostomy tube into the gastric remnant at RYGB in a rat model is technically feasible. Our initial findings support the role of duodenal exclusion in improving glucose metabolism after RYGB.
METHODS: We performed RYGB with simultaneous placement of a gastrostomy tube in the excluded gastric remnant in 8 obese Sprague-Dawley rats. A second group of 8 obese Sprague-Dawley rats underwent gastrostomy tube placement without gastric bypass and served as the controls. Each rat was tested for oral glucose tolerance preoperatively. On postoperative days 14 and 28, glucose tolerance was re-evaluated using the oral and gastrostomy tube routes.
RESULTS: The gastrostomy tubes were successfully inserted in all the rats with no tube-related complications. The area under the curve after oral glucose gavage decreased significantly after gastric bypass (P = .01 at 14 d and P = .003 at 28 d). The gastric remnant glucose gavage after RYGB essentially reversed the effects of surgery on glucose metabolism. The areas under the curve showed no significant differences in the control group between the preoperative and postoperative oral or tube results.
CONCLUSION: Placing a gastrostomy tube into the gastric remnant at RYGB in a rat model is technically feasible. Our initial findings support the role of duodenal exclusion in improving glucose metabolism after RYGB.