Pediatrics · 1999
The effect of blood transfusion protocol on retinopathy of prematurity: A prospective, randomized study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brooks S E, Marcus D M, Gillis D, Pirie E, Johnson M H, Bhatia J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the potential influence of anemia and blood transfusions on the rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants. A prospective, randomized, masked trial was performed to determine the influence of red blood cell transfusion protocol on ROP incidence and severity in a population of high-risk infants.
METHODS: A total of 50 infants with birth weights <1251 g were divided randomly into two groups beginning on day of life 29. Group 1 (n = 24) received red cell transfusions during the 6-week study period, only if certain symptom-based guidelines were met. Group 2 (n = 26) received red cell transfusions to maintain the hematocrit level above 40% for the entire 6 weeks. Infants were monitored for ROP, growth, and associated morbidity. Serial measurements of serum glucose, lactate, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, and iron were performed.
RESULTS: ROP occurred in 83% of infants in group 1, and 73% of infants in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in ROP severity, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, or any of the laboratory values except hemoglobin (10.8 vs 13.2 g/dL) and hematocrit (33.9% vs 41.8%) between the groups. Combining data from both groups, there was no association between hemoglobin or hematocrit ratios and ROP incidence or severity.
CONCLUSIONS: A transfusion policy aimed at limiting the amount of blood given to premature infants (symptom-based) during the neonatal period does not impart a significantly different risk for ROP or other associated conditions, than does a policy in which transfusions are given more liberally for replacement purposes.
METHODS: A total of 50 infants with birth weights <1251 g were divided randomly into two groups beginning on day of life 29. Group 1 (n = 24) received red cell transfusions during the 6-week study period, only if certain symptom-based guidelines were met. Group 2 (n = 26) received red cell transfusions to maintain the hematocrit level above 40% for the entire 6 weeks. Infants were monitored for ROP, growth, and associated morbidity. Serial measurements of serum glucose, lactate, ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, and iron were performed.
RESULTS: ROP occurred in 83% of infants in group 1, and 73% of infants in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in ROP severity, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, or any of the laboratory values except hemoglobin (10.8 vs 13.2 g/dL) and hematocrit (33.9% vs 41.8%) between the groups. Combining data from both groups, there was no association between hemoglobin or hematocrit ratios and ROP incidence or severity.
CONCLUSIONS: A transfusion policy aimed at limiting the amount of blood given to premature infants (symptom-based) during the neonatal period does not impart a significantly different risk for ROP or other associated conditions, than does a policy in which transfusions are given more liberally for replacement purposes.