Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus · 1997
Retinal examinations in infants after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Varn M M, Donahue M L, Saunders R A, Baker J D, Smith C M, Wilson M E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ophthalmic examinations performed in infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are recommended because ocular abnormalities have been known to occur after this procedure.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records of infants treated with ECMO was subsequently underwent routine ophthalmic examination prior to or immediately after hospital discharge. Examinations were performed in a fashion similar to that for retinopathy of prematurity screening.
RESULTS: Eye examinations were recorded for 171 patients (342 eyes). Fundus examination was normal in 302 eyes (88%). Abnormal retinovascular findings such as venous dilation or intraretinal hemorrhages, when present, were not considered vision threatening and required no treatment.
CONCLUSION: Clinically important retinal findings were not identified in our patients undergoing postECMO screening. Routine dilated fundus examination is probably not cost effective and places additional and potentially unnecessary stress on these infants.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records of infants treated with ECMO was subsequently underwent routine ophthalmic examination prior to or immediately after hospital discharge. Examinations were performed in a fashion similar to that for retinopathy of prematurity screening.
RESULTS: Eye examinations were recorded for 171 patients (342 eyes). Fundus examination was normal in 302 eyes (88%). Abnormal retinovascular findings such as venous dilation or intraretinal hemorrhages, when present, were not considered vision threatening and required no treatment.
CONCLUSION: Clinically important retinal findings were not identified in our patients undergoing postECMO screening. Routine dilated fundus examination is probably not cost effective and places additional and potentially unnecessary stress on these infants.