MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.001

Медицинская библиотека · American heart journal · 2022

COMPARE LAAO: Rationale and design of the randomized controlled trial "COMPARing Effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion to standard of care for atrial fibrillation patients at high stroke risk and ineligible to use oral anticoagulation therapy".

Huijboom Marina, Maarse Moniek, Aarnink Errol, van Dijk Vincent, Swaans Martin, van der Heijden Jeroen, IJsselmuiden Sander, Folkeringa Richard, Blaauw Yuri, Elvan Arif, Stevenhagen Jeroen, Vlachojannis George, van der Voort Pepijn, Westra Sjoerd, Chaldoupi Marisevi, Khan Muchtiar, de Groot Joris, van der Kley Frank, van Mieghem Nicolas, van Dijk Ewoud, Dijkgraaf Marcel, Tijssen Jan, Boersma Lucas

СтатьяПротокол клинического исследованияПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with a long-term or permanent contraindication for OAC randomized controlled trial (RCT) data is lacking.

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of LAAO in AF patients who are ineligible to use OAC. The co-primary efficacy endpoint is (1) time to first occurrence of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or undetermined) and (2) time to first occurrence of the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE). The primary safety endpoint is the 30-day rate of peri-procedural complications.

STUDY

DESIGN

This is a multicenter, investigator-initiated, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE), superiority-driven RCT. Patients with AF, a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 for men and ≥3 for women and a long-term or permanent contraindication for OAC will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to the device- or control arm. Patients in the device arm will undergo percutaneous LAAO and will receive post-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) per protocol, while those in the control arm will continue their current treatment consisting of no antithrombotic therapy or (D)APT as deemed appropriate by the primary responsible physician. In this endpoint-driven trial design, assuming a 50% lower stroke risk of LAAO compared to conservative treatment, 609 patients will be followed for a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 5 years. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses will be performed to allow decision-making on reimbursement of LAAO for the target population in the Netherlands.

SUMMARY: The COMPARE LAAO trial will investigate the clinical superiority in preventing thromboembolic events and cost-effectiveness of LAAO in AF patients with a high thromboembolic risk and a contraindication for OAC use.

NCT TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04676880.

Для цитирования: Huijboom Marina, Maarse Moniek, Aarnink Errol, van Dijk Vincent, Swaans Martin, van der Heijden Jeroen, IJsselmuiden Sander, Folkeringa Richard, Blaauw Yuri, Elvan Arif, Stevenhagen Jeroen, Vlachojannis George, van der Voort Pepijn, Westra Sjoerd, Chaldoupi Marisevi, Khan Muchtiar, de Groot Joris, van der Kley Frank, van Mieghem Nicolas, van Dijk Ewoud, Dijkgraaf Marcel, Tijssen Jan, Boersma Lucas. COMPARE LAAO: Rationale and design of the randomized controlled trial "COMPARing Effectiveness and safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion to standard of care for atrial fibrillation patients at high stroke risk and ineligible to use oral anticoagulation therapy".. American heart journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.