MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.021

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of surgical research · 2016

Resident performance in complex simulated urinary catheter scenarios.

Nathwani Jay N, Law Katherine E, Ray Rebecca D, O'Connell Long Bridget R, Fiers Rebekah M, D'Angelo Anne-Lise D, DiMarco Shannon M, Pugh Carla M

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Urinary catheter insertion is a common procedure performed in hospitals. Improper catheterization can lead to unnecessary catheter-associated urinary tract infections and urethral trauma, increasing patient morbidity. To prevent such complications, guidelines were created on how to insert and troubleshoot urinary catheters. As nurses have an increasing responsibility for catheter placement, resident responsibility has shifted to more complex scenarios. This study examines the clinical decision-making skills of surgical residents during simulated urinary catheter scenarios. We hypothesize that during urinary catheterization, residents will make inconsistent decisions relating to catheter choices and clinical presentations.

METHODS

Forty-five general surgery residents (postgraduate year 2-4) in Midwest training programs were presented with three of four urinary catheter scenarios of varying difficulty. Residents were allowed 15 min to complete the scenarios with five different urinary catheter choices. A chi-square test was performed to examine the relation between initial and subsequent catheter choices and to evaluate for consistency of decision-making for each scenario.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent of residents performed scenario A; 49% performed scenario B; 64% performed scenario C, and 82% performed scenario D. For initial attempt for scenario A-C, the 16 French Foley catheter was the most common choice (38%, 54%, 50%, P's < 0.001), whereas for scenario D, the 16 French Coude was the most common choice (37%, P < 0.01). Residents were most likely to be successful in achieving urine output in the initial catheterization attempt (P < 0.001). Chi-square analyses showed no relationship between residents' first and subsequent catheter choices for each scenario (P's > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of clinical decision-making shows that initial catheter choice may have been deliberate based on patient background, as evidenced by the most popular choice in scenario D. Analyses of subsequent choices in each of the catheterization models reveal inconsistency. These findings suggest a possible lack of competence or training in clinical decision-making with regard to urinary catheter choices in residents.

Для цитирования: Nathwani Jay N, Law Katherine E, Ray Rebecca D, O'Connell Long Bridget R, Fiers Rebekah M, D'Angelo Anne-Lise D, DiMarco Shannon M, Pugh Carla M. Resident performance in complex simulated urinary catheter scenarios.. The Journal of surgical research. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.