Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2015
[Effects of preventive double-J stent placement in ureteral obstruction treatment with metal stents on animal model].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morcillo Esther, Sánchez-Margallo Francisco Miguel, Serrano Alvaro, Fernández-Aparicio Tomas, Pamplona Manuel, Soria Federico
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this experimental study is to assess the additive effects of temporary JJ stent placement together with metal stents (MS) in the treatment obstructive uropathy, in order to reduce urothelial hyperplasia formation.
METHODS: Twenty-four pigs were included, and an experimental model of obstructive uropathy was created. Six weeks after obstructive uropathy model induction, ureteral obstruction was confirmed using ultrasonography, ureteropyelography and endoluminal ultrasound. Afterwards, animals were randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group I underwent covered MS placement and JJ ureteral stenting for 3 weeks. Animals in Group II received the same MS without simultaneous JJ stenting. The follow-up was at 3 weeks and at 6 months.
RESULTS: Incidence of urothelial hyperplasia was higher in Group I than Group II, but without statically significant differences. On the other hand, Group II showed a significantly higher degree of obstruction severity due to hyperplasia. The migration rate in both groups was 33.3% at the end of the study. Significant differences were shown on animals showing urinary tract infection (UTI) and hyperplasia against those with hyperplasia but no infection. There was a high rate of correlation between UTI and obstructive urothelial hyperplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of JJ ureteral catheter does not inhibit urothelial hyperplasia associated with placement of metal mesh stents, although it significantly reduces its obstructive severity in long-term follow-up. Urinary tract infection is directly related to the development and magnitude of the urothelial hyperplasia.
METHODS: Twenty-four pigs were included, and an experimental model of obstructive uropathy was created. Six weeks after obstructive uropathy model induction, ureteral obstruction was confirmed using ultrasonography, ureteropyelography and endoluminal ultrasound. Afterwards, animals were randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group I underwent covered MS placement and JJ ureteral stenting for 3 weeks. Animals in Group II received the same MS without simultaneous JJ stenting. The follow-up was at 3 weeks and at 6 months.
RESULTS: Incidence of urothelial hyperplasia was higher in Group I than Group II, but without statically significant differences. On the other hand, Group II showed a significantly higher degree of obstruction severity due to hyperplasia. The migration rate in both groups was 33.3% at the end of the study. Significant differences were shown on animals showing urinary tract infection (UTI) and hyperplasia against those with hyperplasia but no infection. There was a high rate of correlation between UTI and obstructive urothelial hyperplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of JJ ureteral catheter does not inhibit urothelial hyperplasia associated with placement of metal mesh stents, although it significantly reduces its obstructive severity in long-term follow-up. Urinary tract infection is directly related to the development and magnitude of the urothelial hyperplasia.