The Journal of arthroplasty · 2015
Urinary Retention is Rare After Total Joint Arthroplasty When Using Opioid-Free Regional Anesthesia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tischler Eric H, Restrepo Camilo, Oh Jennifer, Matthews Christopher N, Chen Antonia F, Parvizi Javad
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a relatively common complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Based on the findings of a randomized, prospective study from our institution, we abandoned the routine use of indwelling urinary catheters in patients undergoing elective TJA using opioid-free spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and the risk factors for POUR in this patient population.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 842 consecutive patients underwent TJA between January 2012 and September 2014 using opioid-free spinal anesthesia in whom indwelling urinary catheters were not used. Postoperative urinary retention was defined as the inability of a patient to void that necessitated the placement of either an indwelling urinary catheter or straight catheterization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for developing POUR.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 79 patients (79/842; 9.3%) developed POUR. Independent risk factors for POUR were history of a benign prostatic hyperplasia (P = .02), renal disease (P = .001), longer operative time (P = .003), and age older than 67 years (P = .02). No patients in this cohort developed neurogenic bladder.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the routine use of indwelling urinary catheters for patients undergoing TJA using an opioid-free spinal anesthesia may not be warranted. Urinary catheters may be used selectively in patients at risk for subsequent urinary retention.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 842 consecutive patients underwent TJA between January 2012 and September 2014 using opioid-free spinal anesthesia in whom indwelling urinary catheters were not used. Postoperative urinary retention was defined as the inability of a patient to void that necessitated the placement of either an indwelling urinary catheter or straight catheterization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for developing POUR.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 79 patients (79/842; 9.3%) developed POUR. Independent risk factors for POUR were history of a benign prostatic hyperplasia (P = .02), renal disease (P = .001), longer operative time (P = .003), and age older than 67 years (P = .02). No patients in this cohort developed neurogenic bladder.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the routine use of indwelling urinary catheters for patients undergoing TJA using an opioid-free spinal anesthesia may not be warranted. Urinary catheters may be used selectively in patients at risk for subsequent urinary retention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, SpinalArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeContraindicationsElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Retention