Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 1998
[No effect of diabetes mellitus on the morphology of the optic nerve papilla in primary open angle glaucoma].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Budde W M, Jonas J B
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the optic disc morphology in primary open-angle glaucoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a group of 364 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, a subgroup of 52 patients with diabetes mellitus and a second subgroup of 312 patients without diabetes mellitus were compared with each other. Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy had been excluded. Both subgroups were matched for age, gender, and refractive error. The optic disc was morphometrically evaluated using stereo disc photographs.
RESULTS: The two subgroups did not vary significantly (p > 0.10) in mean size of the optic disc, neuroretinal rim and zones Alpha and Beta of the parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy, and frequencies of disc hemorrhages.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with or without diabetes mellitus do not differ significantly in the morphology of the optic disc. One may conclude that diabetes mellitus does not markedly influence planimetric assessed optic disc damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, if eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy have been excluded.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a group of 364 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, a subgroup of 52 patients with diabetes mellitus and a second subgroup of 312 patients without diabetes mellitus were compared with each other. Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy had been excluded. Both subgroups were matched for age, gender, and refractive error. The optic disc was morphometrically evaluated using stereo disc photographs.
RESULTS: The two subgroups did not vary significantly (p > 0.10) in mean size of the optic disc, neuroretinal rim and zones Alpha and Beta of the parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy, and frequencies of disc hemorrhages.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with or without diabetes mellitus do not differ significantly in the morphology of the optic disc. One may conclude that diabetes mellitus does not markedly influence planimetric assessed optic disc damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, if eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy have been excluded.