European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2020
Intubation decision criteria in adult epiglottitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pineau P M, Gautier J, Pineau A, Emam N, Laccourreye L, Boucher S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To identify contributive criteria in decision-making for intubation in acute epiglottitis, based on clinical and endoscopic data in adult patients, and to study clinical and biological characteristics and management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diagnosis was established by flexible endoscopy showing epiglottic edema in association with general signs of sepsis in 28 patients consulting into two French hospitals between 2005 and 2016. Retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis between patients managed by intubation (Group I) or surveillance (Group S) was performed on clinical and endoscopic data.
RESULTS: Ten patients were intubated (36%). On univariate analysis, 4 variables were suggestively associated with intubation. On multivariate analysis, associations remained suggestive for dyspnea (OR=50.6; 95% CI=[2.7; 940.1]) and supraglottic edema extension (OR=42.2; 95% CI=[2.2; 799.5]). The area under the curve identifying intubated patients on these 2 criteria was 90.8%, testifying to high discrimination.
CONCLUSION: Intubation must always be considered in epiglottitis. Dyspnea and supraglottic extension of the edema seem to be the two main criteria to be considered in airway control decision-making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diagnosis was established by flexible endoscopy showing epiglottic edema in association with general signs of sepsis in 28 patients consulting into two French hospitals between 2005 and 2016. Retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis between patients managed by intubation (Group I) or surveillance (Group S) was performed on clinical and endoscopic data.
RESULTS: Ten patients were intubated (36%). On univariate analysis, 4 variables were suggestively associated with intubation. On multivariate analysis, associations remained suggestive for dyspnea (OR=50.6; 95% CI=[2.7; 940.1]) and supraglottic edema extension (OR=42.2; 95% CI=[2.2; 799.5]). The area under the curve identifying intubated patients on these 2 criteria was 90.8%, testifying to high discrimination.
CONCLUSION: Intubation must always be considered in epiglottitis. Dyspnea and supraglottic extension of the edema seem to be the two main criteria to be considered in airway control decision-making.