MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of glaucoma · 1996

Ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: a comparative study of their retrobulbar blood flow velocity.

Nicolela M T, Walman B E, Buckley A R, Drance S M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the orbital blood flow velocities of patients with long-standing ocular hypertension and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

Twenty patients with ocular hypertension were recruited from our clinic and underwent color Doppler imaging evaluation of their retrobulbar vessels. The blood flow velocities and resistance index of their central retinal artery, temporal short posterior ciliary artery, and ophthalmic artery were compared with those of 20 glaucoma patients individually matched for age and level of the highest untreated intraocular pressure ever recorded.

RESULTS

Glaucoma patients had significantly lower peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity than did patients with ocular hypertension in their central retinal artery (p < 0.001). No significant difference between the groups was observed in the other vessels studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Glaucoma patients had lower blood flow velocity in the central retinal artery compared with that of ocular hypertension patients of similar age and level of untreated intraocular pressure. This might be important in the development of glaucomatous damage in those patients.

Для цитирования: Nicolela M T, Walman B E, Buckley A R, Drance S M. Ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma: a comparative study of their retrobulbar blood flow velocity.. Journal of glaucoma. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.