Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 1996
A comparison of latanoprost and timolol in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. A 12-week study.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mishima H K, Masuda K, Kitazawa Y, Azuma I, Araie M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect and the side effects of latanoprost (PhXA41), a new phenyl-substituted prostaglandin F2 alpha-isopropyl ester analogue, in patients with elevated IOP, using timolol maleate as the reference drug.
METHODS: A total of 184 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension at 35 medical centers participated in this randomized double-masked study. The patients were randomized to receive either 0.005% latanoprost once daily or 0.5% timolol maleate twice daily, for a period of 12 weeks. Intraocular pressure was measured 24 hours after the administration of timolol, at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS: Latanoprost reduced IOP at the end of 12 weeks by 6.2 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) (26.8%), while timolol reduced IOP by 4.4 +/- 2.3 mm Hg (19.9%). At all visits latanoprost reduced IOP significantly more than timolol did. The main ocular side effects observed in both groups were conjunctival hyperemia and smarting. The main systemic side effect was a reduced pulse rate, which occurred in patients treated with timolol.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that 0.005% latanoprost taken once daily is well tolerated and more effective in reducing IOP than 0.5% timolol taken twice daily. Thus, latanoprost may become an important choice for the medical treatment of glaucoma.
METHODS: A total of 184 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension at 35 medical centers participated in this randomized double-masked study. The patients were randomized to receive either 0.005% latanoprost once daily or 0.5% timolol maleate twice daily, for a period of 12 weeks. Intraocular pressure was measured 24 hours after the administration of timolol, at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.
RESULTS: Latanoprost reduced IOP at the end of 12 weeks by 6.2 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) (26.8%), while timolol reduced IOP by 4.4 +/- 2.3 mm Hg (19.9%). At all visits latanoprost reduced IOP significantly more than timolol did. The main ocular side effects observed in both groups were conjunctival hyperemia and smarting. The main systemic side effect was a reduced pulse rate, which occurred in patients treated with timolol.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that 0.005% latanoprost taken once daily is well tolerated and more effective in reducing IOP than 0.5% timolol taken twice daily. Thus, latanoprost may become an important choice for the medical treatment of glaucoma.