Journal of glaucoma · 1996
Brightness discrimination test is not useful in screening for open angle glaucoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peter E, Thomas R, Muliyil J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Brightness discrimination test (BDT) is routinely employed to assess asymmetrical optic nerve dysfunction and has been suggested as a screening test for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). We tested the reliability and validity of BDT in the diagnosis of POAG.
METHODS: The study groups included 34 patients with established primary open angle glaucoma, 20 glaucoma suspects, and 33 age-sex matched controls. Cataract was not an exclusion criterion in these groups. The normal brightness score was determined to be 88% (mean score, 94%-2 SD) in a pilot study. Brightness discrimination test was performed in all subjects by two observers independently. BDT showed an excellent interobserver agreement (weighted Kappa 0.84).
RESULTS: The presence of a cataract alone increased the risk of brightness impairment twofold, glaucoma alone increased the risk eightfold, and the presence of both conditions by 17 times compared to those with neither condition. BDT was not a useful test in the diagnosis of POAG (sensitivity 67% and specificity 93%); the ability to detect a significant field defect was also poor (sensitivity 53% and specificity 76%).
CONCLUSIONS: There was poor association between decreased brightness scores and asymmetrical field defects as determined by the Humphrey's field analyzer (HFA).
METHODS: The study groups included 34 patients with established primary open angle glaucoma, 20 glaucoma suspects, and 33 age-sex matched controls. Cataract was not an exclusion criterion in these groups. The normal brightness score was determined to be 88% (mean score, 94%-2 SD) in a pilot study. Brightness discrimination test was performed in all subjects by two observers independently. BDT showed an excellent interobserver agreement (weighted Kappa 0.84).
RESULTS: The presence of a cataract alone increased the risk of brightness impairment twofold, glaucoma alone increased the risk eightfold, and the presence of both conditions by 17 times compared to those with neither condition. BDT was not a useful test in the diagnosis of POAG (sensitivity 67% and specificity 93%); the ability to detect a significant field defect was also poor (sensitivity 53% and specificity 76%).
CONCLUSIONS: There was poor association between decreased brightness scores and asymmetrical field defects as determined by the Humphrey's field analyzer (HFA).