MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/2277-9175.148231

Медицинская библиотека · Advanced biomedical research · 2014

Comparison the efficacy of ablative CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser on the healing of cutaneous leishmaniasis scars.

Nilforoushzadeh Mohammad Ali, Minaravesh Shahriar, Jaffary Fariba, Siadat Amir Hossein, Haftbaradaran Elaheh

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare ablative CO2 laser with fractional CO2 laser on healing of the wound and the size of cutaneous leishmaniasis scars.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical trial study was done on 120 patients in two groups evaluated in Sedigheh Tahereh Hospital in Isfahan. The patients in case group underwent one session ablative CO2 laser for treatment of leishmaniasis scars and the patients in control group underwent six 3-weeks interval sessions fractional CO2 laser for treatment of leishmaniasis scars. All cases were evaluated from size and other aspects of scar by a questionnaire, and before and 6 months after photos were evaluated by blinded dermatologist. The data collected in the check list was then analyzed by t-test and Chi-square with SPSS 20.

RESULTS

There were 60 people in case group and 60 in control group. The mean age was 27.21 ± 11.2. Our results show that fractional CO2 laser is better than ablative CO2 laser in various aspect of treatment of leishmaniasis scars (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fractional CO2 laser is better than ablative CO2 laser in variants aspect of treatment of leishmaniasis scars.

Для цитирования: Nilforoushzadeh Mohammad Ali, Minaravesh Shahriar, Jaffary Fariba, Siadat Amir Hossein, Haftbaradaran Elaheh. Comparison the efficacy of ablative CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser on the healing of cutaneous leishmaniasis scars.. Advanced biomedical research. 2014. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.148231.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.