American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2002
Differential effects of stable prostacyclin analogs on smooth muscle proliferation and cyclic AMP generation in human pulmonary artery.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clapp Lucie H, Finney Paul, Turcato Sally, Tran Sandy, Rubin Lewis J, Tinker Andrew
Аннотация
Primary pulmonary hypertension is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance and smooth muscle proliferation. Stable analogs are increasingly being used to treat this disease, although no data exists comparing their effects on proliferation. We therefore investigated the antiproliferative activity of several prostacyclin (PGI(2)) analogs on human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells, including UT-15 and iloprost, analogs that have recently completed successful clinical trials. Serum-induced proliferation, as assessed by [(3)H]thymidine incorporation (30 h) or cell number (48 h), was significantly inhibited with a 10-fold difference in potency, ranking in effectiveness UT-15 > iloprost > cicaprost > beraprost. Effects were reversed by the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor, 2,5'dideoxyadenosine (DDA) but not SQ22536. Intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) was elevated by all analogs and inhibited by DDA, although SQ22536 was a highly variable inhibitor, suggesting that different pathways might mediate cAMP generation. UT-15 produced a significantly larger and more sustained increase in cAMP compared with other analogs, with iloprost being the weakest elevator. Thus, PGI(2) analogs potently inhibit proliferation of human pulmonary artery, probably via a cAMP-dependent pathway, although cAMP elevation in itself is not a good predictor of antiproliferative potency.