Stroke · 2018
Number of Stent Retriever Passes Associated With Futile Recanalization in Acute Stroke.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baek Jang-Hyun, Kim Byung Moon, Heo Ji Hoe, Nam Hyo Suk, Kim Young Dae, Park Hyungjong, Bang Oh Young, Yoo Joonsang, Kim Dong Joon, Jeon Pyoung, Baik Seung Kug, Suh Sang Hyun, Lee Kyung-Yul, Kwak Hyo Sung, Roh Hong Gee, Lee Young-Jun, Kim Sang Heum, Ryu Chang Woo, Ihn Yon-Kwon, Kim Byungjun, Jeon Hong-Jun, Kim Jin Woo, Byun Jun Soo, Suh Sangil, Park Jeong Jin, Lee Woong Jae, Roh Jieun, Shin Byoung-Soo
Аннотация
Background and Purpose- Stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy has become the mainstay of treatment of acute intracranial large artery occlusion. However, it is still not much known about the optimal limit of SR attempts for favorable outcome. We evaluated whether a specific number of SR passes for futile recanalization can be determined. Methods- Patients who were treated with a SR as the first endovascular modality for their intracranial large artery occlusion in anterior circulation were retrospectively reviewed. The recanalization rate for each SR pass was calculated. The association between the number of SR passes and a patient's functional outcome was analyzed. Results- A total of 467 patients were included. Successful recanalization by SR alone was achieved in 82.2% of patients. Recanalization rates got sequentially lower as the number of passes increased, and the recanalization rate achievable by ≥5 passes of the SR was 5.5%. In a multivariable analysis, functional outcomes were more favorable in patients with 1 to 4 passes of the SR than in patients without recanalization (odds ratio [OR] was 8.06 for 1 pass; OR 7.78 for 2 passes; OR 6.10 for 3 passes; OR 6.57 for 4 passes; all P<0.001). However, the functional outcomes of patients with ≥5 passes were not significantly more favorable than found among patients without recanalization (OR 1.70 with 95% CI, 0.42-6.90 for 5 passes, P=0.455; OR 0.33 with 0.02-5.70, P=0.445 for ≥6 passes). Conclusions- The likelihood of successful recanalization got sequentially lower as the number of SR passes increased. Five or more passes of the SR became futile in terms of the recanalization rate and functional outcomes.