DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.012
Accuracy of smartphone-based evaluation of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion on CTA.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard of care for stroke caused by an emergent large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, and the ability to rapidly review CTA is one hurdle in minimizing the time from diagnosis to intervention. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and confidence in review of stroke CTA for ELVO via a smartphone-based application as compared to PACS workstation.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
Seventy-six head and neck CTA studies performed for stroke from one comprehensive and seven primary stroke centers were independently reviewed remotely on smartphone by two blinded interventional neuroradiologists in actual-use circumstances. The presence and location of large vessel occlusion(s), diagnostic quality, and confidence in interpretation were recorded. Comparison was made to blinded PACS workstation review performed at a delayed interval. Weighted Kappa and Kendall's Tau statistics were calculated to evaluate intra- and inter-observer reliability.
RESULTS
Of the 76 studies, 20 (26%) had a large vessel occlusion. 14 M1 segment occlusions (18%); 2 ICA terminus (3%); 2 tandem carotid and M1 (3%); and 2 basilar artery (3%). There was 100% diagnostic accuracy by both PACS workstation and smartphone review (p = .9999) with high inter- and intra-rater reliability for assessments of both image quality and diagnostic confidence.
CONCLUSION
In actual-use circumstances, experienced neuroradiologists can diagnose ELVOs on CTA using a smartphone application as accurately as on PACS workstation without degradation of confidence. These findings support the use of mobile electronic devices by stroke centers to rapidly triage patients for mechanical thrombectomy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.