MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf069

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025

Investigating the link between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy through perceptions of efficacy and unsafety.

Yu Nan, Li Jinxu, Wang Weirui, Miller Ann Neville

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Misinformation has played a significant role in shaping public attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, contributing to vaccine hesitancy. This study examines the relationship between misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the mediating roles of perceived vaccine safety and efficacy. Additionally, it explores how trust in misinformation influences these relationships.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and May 2021 across four university campuses in the southeastern United States (N = 819). Participants (Mean age = 20.55, SD = 2.85) were predominantly female (N = 525, 64.1%). Mediation and moderated mediation analyses were performed using Hayes' PROCESS Model 4 and Model 8.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that greater exposure to vaccine misinformation was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. This relationship was mediated by increased perceptions of vaccine unsafety and reduced beliefs in vaccine efficacy. Additionally, trust in misinformation strengthened the indirect effect through perceived vaccine unsafety, reinforcing hesitancy among individuals who found misinformation more credible.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the critical role of misinformation in shaping vaccine hesitancy. By identifying the psychological mechanisms underlying this relationship, these insights can inform strategies to counter misinformation, improve public trust in vaccines, and enhance health communication in future public health crises.

Для цитирования: Yu Nan, Li Jinxu, Wang Weirui, Miller Ann Neville. Investigating the link between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and vaccine hesitancy through perceptions of efficacy and unsafety.. Journal of public health (Oxford, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf069.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.