American journal of surgery · 2025
Healthcare facility volume and evidence-based practice implementation in surgical care of patients with common cancers.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Montgomery Kelsey B, Rademacher Nicole, Richman Joshua S, Bhatia Smita, Broman Kristy K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) can serve as an indicator of quality for common cancers. This study evaluated the impact of hospital volume on EBP implementation for common cancers.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent curative-intent treatment for breast, colon, melanoma, and thyroid cancer from 2010 to 2020 used data from the National Cancer Database. Eight EBP measures, two per disease site, were evaluated across facility volume quartiles using mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.
RESULTS: There were 2,893,655 patients (breast n = 1,731,433, colon n = 481,858, melanoma. n = 418,841, thyroid n = 261,523) (median age 63). EBP implementation was higher at the highest-volume sites compared to lowest (range by measure: 71 %-95 % and 60 %-90 % respectively). The adjusted odds of receiving EBP was greater at higher-volume facilities for six of eight measures.
CONCLUSION: Volume-associations in EBP implementation may influence system-level decision making around care allocation for common cancers.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent curative-intent treatment for breast, colon, melanoma, and thyroid cancer from 2010 to 2020 used data from the National Cancer Database. Eight EBP measures, two per disease site, were evaluated across facility volume quartiles using mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and facility characteristics.
RESULTS: There were 2,893,655 patients (breast n = 1,731,433, colon n = 481,858, melanoma. n = 418,841, thyroid n = 261,523) (median age 63). EBP implementation was higher at the highest-volume sites compared to lowest (range by measure: 71 %-95 % and 60 %-90 % respectively). The adjusted odds of receiving EBP was greater at higher-volume facilities for six of eight measures.
CONCLUSION: Volume-associations in EBP implementation may influence system-level decision making around care allocation for common cancers.