Eye (London, England) · 2009
A comparison of induced astigmatism in 20- vs 25-gauge vitrectomy procedures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Galway G, Drury B, Cronin B G, Bourke R D
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Surgically induced astigmatism is an unwanted variable that can lead to poorer visual and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing vitrectomy even when a technically precise procedure has been performed. This study assesses the difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) between the traditional 20-gauge vitrectomy and the newer 25-gauge sutureless technique by comparing pre- and post-procedure keratometry readings.
METHOD: The study is a retrospective consecutive case series of vitrectomies performed by a single surgeon. There were a total of 47 patients, eight with bilateral procedures, 24 who underwent the 20 gauge, and 31 who had the 25-gauge procedure. Patients were excluded for corneal altering pathology or scleral buckling procedures. Vector analysis of pre- and post-vitrectomy readings was performed using Alpin's method, facilitated by the ASSORT program version 4.1.
RESULTS: Mean time at which post-operative keratometry readings were taken was 3.9 months (1-36). Mean astigmatism at presentation was 0.63 D and 0.92 D and at post-surgically follow-up 1.14 D and 0.91 D (20 and 25 gauge, respectively). Mean SIA was 0.66 D (SD=0.8 D) for the 20-gauge group and 0.27 D (SD=0.23 D) for the 25 gauge (P=0.037). The calculated figure of SIA variability representing the 95% CI for the maximum amount of SIA for each procedure was 2.26 D and 0.73 D for the 20- and 25-gauge procedure, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the 25-gauge technique involves a statistically significant reduction in the amount of SIA. This can ultimately lead to a better visual and refractive outcome for the patient.
METHOD: The study is a retrospective consecutive case series of vitrectomies performed by a single surgeon. There were a total of 47 patients, eight with bilateral procedures, 24 who underwent the 20 gauge, and 31 who had the 25-gauge procedure. Patients were excluded for corneal altering pathology or scleral buckling procedures. Vector analysis of pre- and post-vitrectomy readings was performed using Alpin's method, facilitated by the ASSORT program version 4.1.
RESULTS: Mean time at which post-operative keratometry readings were taken was 3.9 months (1-36). Mean astigmatism at presentation was 0.63 D and 0.92 D and at post-surgically follow-up 1.14 D and 0.91 D (20 and 25 gauge, respectively). Mean SIA was 0.66 D (SD=0.8 D) for the 20-gauge group and 0.27 D (SD=0.23 D) for the 25 gauge (P=0.037). The calculated figure of SIA variability representing the 95% CI for the maximum amount of SIA for each procedure was 2.26 D and 0.73 D for the 20- and 25-gauge procedure, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the 25-gauge technique involves a statistically significant reduction in the amount of SIA. This can ultimately lead to a better visual and refractive outcome for the patient.