DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.022
Wavefront aberrations in eyes with decentered ablations.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the refractive and functional outcomes and wavefront profiles in eyes with decentered ablations and eyes with well-centered ablations.
SETTING
Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
METHODS
This retrospective analysis comprised eyes with topographically diagnosed decentered ablations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Refraction, contrast sensitivity, and ocular wavefront aberrations were measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. The induced aberrations in these eyes were compared with those in eyes with well-centered ablations.
RESULTS
Forty-six eyes (38 patients) had decentered ablations and 60 eyes (32 patients), well-centered ablations. The mean decentration in the study group was 0.86 mm +/- 0.29 (SD) (range 0.35 to 1.61 mm). There was no significant correlation between decentration and attempted refractive correction. There was, however, a statistically significant (P<.05) linear correlation between the distance of decentration and the magnitude of induced tilt (r = -0.31), coma (r = -0.41), and secondary astigmatism (r = 0.36). The induced changes in tilt, oblique astigmatism, vertical coma, and spherical aberration were statistically significantly higher in eyes with decentered ablations than in eyes with well-centered ablations. A statistically significantly higher percentage of eyes (87%) with well-centered ablations than eyes with decentered ablations (70%) had a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between groups.
CONCLUSION
Eyes with decentered ablations had a significantly higher magnitude of induced aberrations and lower UCVA than eyes with well-centered ablations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.