Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2009
Iris registration in wavefront-guided LASIK to correct mixed astigmatism.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khalifa Mounir, El-Kateb Mohamed, Shaheen Mohamed Shafik
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the predictability, safety, and efficiency of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with iris-registration technology to correct mixed astigmatism.
SETTING: Vision correction center, Alexandria, Egypt.
METHODS: This retrospective double-blind study included randomly selected patients with mixed astigmatism who sought laser refractive surgery. Patients were divided equally into 3 groups and treated with conventional LASIK and manual marking, wavefront-guided LASIK and manual marking, or wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (LASIK+IR group). Eyes were analyzed preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The LASIK+IR group had better postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (100% 20/30 or better; 90% 20/20 or better; 20% 20/16 or better) than the other groups and did not lose preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, unlike the other groups. This group also had the highest percentage of eyes that gained lines of acuity (20% 1 line; 10% 2 lines). The LASIK+IR group had the highest predictability of spherical refraction (80% within +/-0.50 diopter [D]; 100% within +/-1.00 D [P<.05] and the highest predictability of cylinder refraction. The LASIK+IR eyes had a significantly smaller increase postoperatively in coma, trefoil, and secondary astigmatism. There was no significant difference between groups in spherical aberration or quadrafoil. The LASIK-IR group had the most improvement in scotopic contrast sensitivity (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration was more predictable, safe, and efficient than conventional or wavefront-guided LASIK with manual marking in correcting mixed astigmatism. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
SETTING: Vision correction center, Alexandria, Egypt.
METHODS: This retrospective double-blind study included randomly selected patients with mixed astigmatism who sought laser refractive surgery. Patients were divided equally into 3 groups and treated with conventional LASIK and manual marking, wavefront-guided LASIK and manual marking, or wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration (LASIK+IR group). Eyes were analyzed preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The LASIK+IR group had better postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (100% 20/30 or better; 90% 20/20 or better; 20% 20/16 or better) than the other groups and did not lose preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, unlike the other groups. This group also had the highest percentage of eyes that gained lines of acuity (20% 1 line; 10% 2 lines). The LASIK+IR group had the highest predictability of spherical refraction (80% within +/-0.50 diopter [D]; 100% within +/-1.00 D [P<.05] and the highest predictability of cylinder refraction. The LASIK+IR eyes had a significantly smaller increase postoperatively in coma, trefoil, and secondary astigmatism. There was no significant difference between groups in spherical aberration or quadrafoil. The LASIK-IR group had the most improvement in scotopic contrast sensitivity (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK with iris registration was more predictable, safe, and efficient than conventional or wavefront-guided LASIK with manual marking in correcting mixed astigmatism. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.