Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2008
Wavefront optimized versus custom-Q treatments in surface ablation for myopic astigmatism with the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO laser.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stojanovic Aleksandar, Wang Ling, Jankov Mirko R, Nitter Tore A, Wang Qinmei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare treatments with wavefront optimized and custom-Q ablations.
METHODS: Two consecutive groups of eyes were treated for myopia and astigmatism with surface ablation. One group was treated with wavefront optimized ablation and the second group was treated with custom-Q ablation. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Q-values, higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, and classic outcome parameters were analyzed.
RESULTS: The wavefront optimized ablation group was comprised of 46 eyes of 23 patients with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of -3.64 diopters (D) (range: -1.15 to -8.25 D); mean Q-value changed from -0.33 preoperatively to 0.06 postoperatively. The custom-Q ablation group was comprised of 42 eyes of 21 patients with a mean SE of -3.24 D (range: -1.47 to -8.00 D); mean Q-value changed from -0.36 preoperatively to -0.03 postoperatively. A statistically significant difference in postoperative change in Q-values (P = .049) between the two groups was noted, but there was no such difference in higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, or classic outcome parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Custom-Q ablation resulted in a mean postoperative asphericity that was closer to preoperative compared to wavefront optimized ablation, whereas the other outcome parameters showed no statistically significant differences.
METHODS: Two consecutive groups of eyes were treated for myopia and astigmatism with surface ablation. One group was treated with wavefront optimized ablation and the second group was treated with custom-Q ablation. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Q-values, higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, and classic outcome parameters were analyzed.
RESULTS: The wavefront optimized ablation group was comprised of 46 eyes of 23 patients with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of -3.64 diopters (D) (range: -1.15 to -8.25 D); mean Q-value changed from -0.33 preoperatively to 0.06 postoperatively. The custom-Q ablation group was comprised of 42 eyes of 21 patients with a mean SE of -3.24 D (range: -1.47 to -8.00 D); mean Q-value changed from -0.36 preoperatively to -0.03 postoperatively. A statistically significant difference in postoperative change in Q-values (P = .049) between the two groups was noted, but there was no such difference in higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, or classic outcome parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Custom-Q ablation resulted in a mean postoperative asphericity that was closer to preoperative compared to wavefront optimized ablation, whereas the other outcome parameters showed no statistically significant differences.