DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.029
Higher-order aberrations in young refractive surgery candidates in India: establishment of normal values and comparison with white and Chinese Asian populations.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To establish normal values of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in young candidates in an Indian population and compare them with results in white and Asian (Chinese) populations.
SETTING
Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
METHODS
This prospective trial comprised 206 consecutive candidates (412 eyes) for customized laser in situ keratomileusis. Exclusion criteria were previous ocular surgery, corneal ectasia, rigid gas-permeable contact lens use, corneal scar, or cataract. Higher-order aberrations were analyzed on a Zywave workstation (Bausch & Lomb Surgical).
RESULTS
The mean age was 23.63 years +/- 1.99 (SD); the mean refractive error, -2.97 +/- 4.0 diopters (D) sphere and -1.73 +/- 3.6 D cylinder; and the mean 6.0 mm HOA root mean square (RMS), 0.36 +/- 0.26 microm. The most predominant HOAs were 3rd order (coma, trefoil). The summated RMS of the 3rd order was the most predominant (mean 0.23 +/- 0.15 microm), followed by the 4th and 5th orders (P<.0001). The ratio between summated RMS means was 1:0.7:0.3, similar to that in white populations (1:0.7:0.3) and different than in Asian (Chinese) populations (1: ~ 0.8:0.002). Third- and 4th-order aberrations were between 60% and 70% higher in Asian (Chinese) eyes. The difference between data in this study and those in others was less than 10% in 3rd and 4th order.
CONCLUSION
The normative data for HOA in Indian eyes closely matched that in white populations but was different from that in Asian (Chinese) populations, which may provide help in nomogram modifications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.