European journal of ophthalmology · 2015
Purtscher retinopathy: to treat or not to treat?
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gil Pedro, Pires Joana, Costa Esmeralda, Matos Rita, Cardoso Mariana Sá, Mariano Manuel
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report a case of Purtscher retinopathy and its therapeutic approach.
METHODS: In this observational case report, complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), and Humphrey 24-2 visual field testing.
RESULTS: The patient complained of right eye diminished visual acuity 48 hours after a car accident, with severe thoracic and abdominal blunt trauma but no direct ocular trauma. The BCVA was counting fingers at 1 meter, anterior segment examination was unremarkable, and the fundus showed cotton-wool spots and Purtscher flecken. Macular OCT revealed subretinal fluid with neurosensorial retinal detachment. The FA showed peripapillary and parafoveal leakage and visual field testing presented a central scotoma. We opted for an observation-only approach. Follow-up revealed a progressive reabsorption of the subretinal fluid with complete resolution of the macular neurosensorial retinal detachment after 2 weeks. After 2 months of follow-up, BCVA was 20/25 and the OCT revealed atrophic changes, with no subretinal fluid. The favorable outcome in terms of BCVA persisted at 4 and 6 months follow-up, although the central scotoma did not improve significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of both acute and late-stage lesions provides a valuable insight to a better characterization of this rare disease. Despite a favorable response with a conservative therapeutic approach, structural and functional late stage sequelae influence the final visual outcome.
METHODS: In this observational case report, complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), fluorescein angiography (FA), and Humphrey 24-2 visual field testing.
RESULTS: The patient complained of right eye diminished visual acuity 48 hours after a car accident, with severe thoracic and abdominal blunt trauma but no direct ocular trauma. The BCVA was counting fingers at 1 meter, anterior segment examination was unremarkable, and the fundus showed cotton-wool spots and Purtscher flecken. Macular OCT revealed subretinal fluid with neurosensorial retinal detachment. The FA showed peripapillary and parafoveal leakage and visual field testing presented a central scotoma. We opted for an observation-only approach. Follow-up revealed a progressive reabsorption of the subretinal fluid with complete resolution of the macular neurosensorial retinal detachment after 2 weeks. After 2 months of follow-up, BCVA was 20/25 and the OCT revealed atrophic changes, with no subretinal fluid. The favorable outcome in terms of BCVA persisted at 4 and 6 months follow-up, although the central scotoma did not improve significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of both acute and late-stage lesions provides a valuable insight to a better characterization of this rare disease. Despite a favorable response with a conservative therapeutic approach, structural and functional late stage sequelae influence the final visual outcome.